California Resources
California Resources' revenue rose 14.7% to $3.7 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 16.3%, down from 19.4% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $543 million, up 53.0%. It paid out $513 million in dividends and buybacks, 94% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 7.4%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share fell 5.3% a year and net income grew 3.0% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 116% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value California Resources yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from California Resources' 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from California Resources' fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $543M, net cash of −$1.2B at December 31, 2025 and 87 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to California Resources: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 10.7% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 12%: 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Oil & Gas Exploration & Production), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $4.9B; the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $54.75
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
The P/E method needs positive earnings, and California Resources' latest diluted earnings per share were negative or zero.
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 305 | 307 | 496 | 372 | 132 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 589 | 592 | 540 | 1,135 | 1,285 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 284 | 285 | 44 | 763 | 1,153 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.6x | 0.3x | 0.0x | 0.8x | 1.0x |
| Debt to equity | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.2x | 0.3x | 0.3x |
| Interest coverage | 10.5x | 18.9x | 14.4x | 7.1x | 5.6x |
| Current ratio | 0.9x | 1.0x | 1.5x | 1.0x | 0.9x |
| Quick ratio | 0.8x | 0.9x | 1.4x | 0.9x | 0.8x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 2 insiders bought $281,056 of California Resources shares on the open market, and 7 insiders sold $222.7 million, $2.7 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4, 2026 | Jay A. BysEVP & Chief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 11,907 | $54.00 | $642,978 | Form 4 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | Jay A. BysEVP & Chief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 11,907 | $54.00 | $642,978 | Form 4 |
| Jul 13, 2026 | Jay A. BysEVP & Chief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 11,907 | $54.00 | $642,978 | Form 4 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Jay A. BysEVP & Chief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 11,907 | $61.68 | $734,424 | Form 4 |
| May 12, 2026 | Michael L. PrestonEVP, Chf Strategy Officer & GC | Sold | 26,409 | $59.82 | $1.6 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Canada Pension Plan Investment Board10% owner | Sold | 3,500,000 | $61.10 | $213.8 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Christopher D. GouldEVP & Chief Sustainability Off | Sold | 24,347 | $62.21 | $1.5 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | Omar HayatEVP & Chief Operating Officer | Sold | 23,000 | $65.87 | $1.5 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Mark Allen McFarlandDirector | Sold | 16,372 | $64.83 | $1.1 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | Noelle M. RepettiSenior VP and Controller | Sold | 8,564 | $63.71 | $545,612 | Form 4 |
| Nov 12, 2025 | Francisco LeonPresident and CEO, Director | Bought | 5,425 | $47.71 | $258,827 | Form 4 |
| Nov 12, 2025 | William B RobyDirector | Bought | 467 | $47.63 | $22,229 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| F-score | 8 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 4 of 8 |
| Accruals ratio | −2.2% | −4.2% | −6.9% |
Compare
Put California Resources side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| California Resources | FY25 | 14.7% | 16.3% | 14.8% | 9.5% | 1.0x | 4 | |
| Matador Resources | FY25 | 5.5% | 33.2% | 7.3% | — | — | — | Compare |
| Crescent Energy | FY25 | 22.1% | 6.4% | — | 2.3% | 4.0x | — | Compare |
| SM Energy | FY25 | 17.2% | 31.7% | — | 11.1% | — | 6 | Compare |
| Range Resources | FY25 | 28.9% | — | 18.9% | 13.7% | 0.9x | 8 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 2,403 | 1,547 | 2,006 | 3,064 | 2,634 | 1,889 | 2,707 | 2,801 | 3,198 | 3,669 |
| Revenue growth | −42.4% | −35.6% | 29.7% | 52.7% | −14.0% | — | 43.3% | 3.5% | 14.2% | 14.7% |
| Gross profit | — | — | 73 | 769 | 429 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | −5,142 | −293 | 73 | 769 | 429 | 293 | 812 | 808 | 620 | 598 |
| Net income | −3,554 | 279 | −266 | 328 | −28 | 612 | 524 | 564 | 376 | 363 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −92.79 | 6.76 | −6.26 | 6.77 | −0.57 | 7.37 | 6.75 | 7.78 | 4.62 | 4.15 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 38 | 40 | 42 | 47 | 49 | 83 | 78 | 72 | 81 | 87 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 403 | 130 | 248 | 461 | 676 | 660 | 690 | 653 | 610 | 865 |
| Capital expenditure | 401 | 75 | 371 | 690 | 455 | 194 | 379 | 185 | 255 | 322 |
| Free cash flow | 2 | 55 | −123 | −229 | 221 | 466 | 311 | 468 | 355 | 543 |
| Dividends paid | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 59 | 81 | 113 | 136 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 148 | 313 | 143 | 192 | 377 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 853 | 440 |
| Stock-based compensation | 37 | 30 | 29 | 45 | 32 | 19 | 30 | 48 | 40 | 39 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 12 | 12 | 20 | 17 | 17 | 305 | 307 | 496 | 372 | 132 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 6,143 | 5,268 | 5,306 | 5,251 | 4,979 | 589 | 592 | 540 | 1,135 | 1,285 |
| Total assets | 7,053 | 6,354 | 6,207 | 7,158 | 6,958 | 3,846 | 3,967 | 3,998 | 7,135 | 7,403 |
| Total liabilities | 7,969 | 6,911 | 6,927 | 7,405 | 7,254 | 2,158 | 2,103 | 1,779 | 3,597 | 3,729 |
| Shareholders' equity | −916 | −557 | −814 | −361 | −389 | 1,688 | 1,864 | 2,219 | 3,538 | 3,674 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | — | — | 3.6% | 25.1% | 16.3% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | −214.0% | −18.9% | 3.6% | 25.1% | 16.3% | 15.5% | 30.0% | 28.9% | 19.4% | 16.3% |
| Net margin | −147.9% | 18.0% | −13.3% | 10.7% | −1.1% | 32.4% | 19.4% | 20.1% | 11.8% | 9.9% |
| Free cash flow margin | 0.1% | 3.6% | −6.1% | −7.5% | 8.4% | 24.7% | 11.5% | 16.7% | 11.1% | 14.8% |
| Return on capital | −57.3% | −5.9% | 1.2% | 16.1% | 8.8% | — | 27.1% | 27.6% | 13.8% | 9.5% |
| Return on equity | −419.4% | — | — | — | — | — | 29.5% | 27.6% | 13.1% | 10.1% |
| Return on assets | −36.5% | 4.2% | −4.2% | 4.9% | −0.4% | — | 13.4% | 14.2% | 6.8% | 5.0% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | 19.8x | 8.6x | 4.1x | 5.5x | 0.6x | 0.3x | 0.0x | 0.8x | 1.0x |