Exelixis
Exelixis' revenue rose 7.0% to $2.3 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 37.6%, up from 27.9% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $876 million, up 30.4%. It paid out $948 million in dividends and buybacks, 108% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 4.8%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2017 to 2025, earnings per share grew 24.2% a year and net income 22.5% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 10%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Exelixis yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Exelixis' 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Exelixis' fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $876M, net cash of $1.1B at January 2, 2026 and 282 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Exelixis: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 12.9% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Biotechnology); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $65.11
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Exelixis' earnings per share of $3.18 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 24.2×, the average of the Health Care median and Exelixis' own P/E today for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $65.11
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Exelixis' P/E at the last close
- 20.5×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurocrine BiosciencesNBIX | $145.87 | $6.82 | 21.4× |
| ExelixisEXEL | $65.11 | $3.18 | 20.5× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 1,467 | 1,308 | 995 | 1,111 | 1,059 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −1,467 | −1,308 | −995 | −1,111 | −1,059 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −4.9x | −5.9x | −5.1x | −1.8x | −1.2x |
| Debt to equity | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Interest coverage | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current ratio | 5.4x | 5.0x | 3.3x | 3.6x | 3.6x |
| Quick ratio | 5.3x | 4.9x | 3.3x | 3.6x | 3.5x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $1.2 million of Exelixis shares on the open market, and 12 insiders sold $42.2 million, $6.9 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | Mary C BeckerleDirector | Sold plan | 9,812 | $53.66 | $526,512 | Form 4 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | Sue Gail EckhardtDirector | Sold plan | 9,812 | $50.14 | $491,974 | Form 4 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | Jack L WyszomierskiDirector | Sold plan | 3,925 | $50.55 | $198,409 | Form 4 |
| May 26, 2026 | Dana AftabEVP, Research and Development | Sold | 43,451 | $50.35 | $2.2 million | Form 4 |
| May 20, 2026 | Patrick J. HaleyEVP, Commercial | Sold | 32,110 | $49.81 | $1.6 million | Form 4 |
| May 18, 2026 | Christopher J. SennerEVP and CFO | Sold | 34,901 | $50.00 | $1.7 million | Form 4 |
| May 18, 2026 | Brenda HeftiSVP and General Counsel | Sold plan | 6,625 | $50.21 | $332,641 | Form 4 |
| May 7, 2026 | George PosteDirector | Sold | 60,000 | $45.71 | $2.7 million | Form 4 |
| May 7, 2026 | Maria C FreireDirector | Sold | 20,634 | $46.00 | $949,164 | Form 4 |
| May 7, 2026 | Mary C BeckerleDirector | Sold | 7,712 | $48.45 | $373,646 | Form 4 |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Dana AftabEVP, Research and Development | Sold | 47,918 | $44.50 | $2.1 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 19, 2026 | Dana AftabEVP, Research and Development | Sold | 29,873 | $44.35 | $1.3 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 4 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 6 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −4.2% | −6.1% | −3.5% |
Compare
Put Exelixis side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exelixis | FY25 | 7.0% | 37.6% | 37.8% | 64.9% | −1.2x | 6 | |
| Fortrea | FY25 | 1.0% | −32.0% | 3.2% | −36.2% | — | — | Compare |
| Moderna | FY25 | −39.9% | −158.1% | −106.2% | −65.4% | — | 2 | Compare |
| Neurocrine Biosciences | FY25 | 21.4% | 21.6% | 26.2% | 25.6% | −2.3x | 6 | Compare |
| BioNTech | FY25 | 4.3% | −49.0% | 9.8% | — | — | — | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 192 | 452 | 854 | 968 | 988 | 1,435 | 1,611 | 1,830 | 2,169 | 2,320 |
| Revenue growth | 415.1% | 136.3% | 88.7% | 13.3% | 2.0% | 45.3% | 12.3% | 13.6% | 18.5% | 7.0% |
| Gross profit | 185 | 437 | 828 | 935 | 951 | 1,382 | 1,553 | 1,758 | 2,092 | 2,236 |
| Research and development | 96 | 112 | 182 | 337 | 548 | 694 | 892 | 1,044 | 910 | 825 |
| Operating income | −28 | 166 | 439 | 370 | 110 | 287 | 202 | 171 | 605 | 872 |
| Net income | −70 | 154 | 690 | 321 | 112 | 231 | 182 | 208 | 521 | 783 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −0.28 | 0.49 | 2.21 | 1.02 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 1.76 | 2.78 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 250 | 312 | 313 | 315 | 318 | 322 | 325 | 322 | 296 | 282 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 206 | 166 | 416 | 527 | 209 | 401 | 363 | 333 | 700 | 884 |
| Capital expenditure | 2 | 21 | 33 | 13 | 30 | 54 | 28 | 40 | 28 | 8 |
| Free cash flow | 205 | 144 | 382 | 514 | 179 | 347 | 335 | 293 | 672 | 876 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 550 | 652 | 948 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 23 | 24 | 41 | 57 | 105 | 120 | 108 | 106 | 94 | 113 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 420 | 388 | 693 | 852 | 1,206 | 1,467 | 1,308 | 995 | 1,111 | 1,059 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 189 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total assets | 598 | 655 | 1,422 | 1,886 | 2,137 | 2,616 | 3,072 | 2,942 | 2,948 | 2,844 |
| Total liabilities | 508 | 370 | 135 | 200 | 258 | 406 | 583 | 678 | 704 | 683 |
| Shareholders' equity | 89 | 285 | 1,288 | 1,686 | 1,879 | 2,211 | 2,488 | 2,264 | 2,244 | 2,161 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 96.6% | 96.7% | 96.9% | 96.6% | 96.3% | 96.3% | 96.4% | 96.0% | 96.5% | 96.4% |
| Operating margin | −14.7% | 36.7% | 51.4% | 38.2% | 11.1% | 20.0% | 12.5% | 9.3% | 27.9% | 37.6% |
| Net margin | −36.7% | 34.1% | 80.8% | 33.2% | 11.3% | 16.1% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 24.0% | 33.7% |
| Free cash flow margin | 106.9% | 31.9% | 44.8% | 53.1% | 18.1% | 24.1% | 20.8% | 16.0% | 31.0% | 37.8% |
| Return on capital | — | — | 178.6% | 41.7% | 12.5% | 31.8% | 16.3% | 11.3% | 38.5% | 64.9% |
| Return on equity | — | 82.4% | 87.8% | 21.6% | 6.3% | 11.3% | 7.8% | 8.7% | 23.1% | 35.5% |
| Return on assets | −15.1% | 24.6% | 66.4% | 19.4% | 5.6% | 9.7% | 6.4% | 6.9% | 17.7% | 27.0% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | −2.3x | −1.6x | −2.3x | −10.1x | −4.9x | −5.9x | −5.1x | −1.8x | −1.2x |