FTI Consulting
FTI Consulting's revenue rose 2.4% to $3.8 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 10.3%, up from 9.4% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $94 million, down 74.0%. It paid out $859 million in dividends and buybacks, 917% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 8.3%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 16.7% a year and net income 13.7% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 21%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value FTI Consulting yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from FTI Consulting's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from FTI Consulting's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $94M, net cash of −$100M at December 31, 2025 and 33 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to FTI Consulting: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 7.7% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 10%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Research & Consulting Services), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $4.7B; the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $161.40
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from FTI Consulting's earnings per share of $8.30 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 26.7×, the middle of FTI Consulting's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (the Industrials median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 11%, 10% and 9%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $161.40
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- FTI Consulting's P/E at the last close
- 19.4×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Verisk AnalyticsVRSK | $196.19 | $6.57 | 29.9× |
| UL SolutionsULS | $72.96 | $2.48 | 29.4× |
| EquifaxEFX | $178.56 | $6.18 | 28.9× |
| TransUnionTRU | $79.62 | $3.61 | 22.1× |
| FTI ConsultingFCN | $161.40 | $8.30 | 19.4× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 494 | 492 | 329 | 660 | 265 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 297 | 315 | 0 | 0 | 365 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −197 | −176 | −329 | −660 | 100 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −0.6x | −0.5x | −0.8x | −1.7x | 0.2x |
| Debt to equity | 0.2x | 0.2x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.2x |
| Interest coverage | 15.4x | 30.2x | 26.4x | 50.0x | 18.2x |
| Current ratio | 1.9x | 2.0x | 1.7x | 1.9x | 1.6x |
| Quick ratio | 1.9x | 2.0x | 1.7x | 1.9x | 1.6x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 3 insiders bought $2.1 million of FTI Consulting shares on the open market, and 2 insiders sold $1.6 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Elsy Lisa BoglioliDirector | Sold | 900 | $150.22 | $135,198 | Form 4 |
| May 13, 2026 | Steven Henry GunbyCEO, Chairman and President, Director | Bought | 10,000 | $144.17 | $1.4 million | Form 4 |
| May 13, 2026 | Paul Alderman LintonChief Strategy/Transf. Officer | Bought | 2,400 | $144.04 | $345,696 | Form 4 |
| May 13, 2026 | Eun NamChief Financial Officer | Bought | 2,000 | $144.59 | $289,180 | Form 4 |
| Mar 9, 2026 | Curtis P LuGeneral Counsel | Sold | 8,710 | $166.60 | $1.5 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| F-score | 7 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 4 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | 1.5% | −3.3% | 3.4% |
Compare
Put FTI Consulting side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTI Consulting | FY25 | 2.4% | 10.3% | 2.5% | 16.6% | 0.2x | 4 | |
| TransUnion | FY25 | 9.4% | 18.7% | 14.5% | 7.1% | 3.0x | 8 | Compare |
| Verisk Analytics | FY25 | 6.6% | 43.7% | 38.8% | 35.5% | 1.6x | 7 | Compare |
| UL Solutions | FY25 | 6.4% | 17.1% | 13.2% | 26.8% | 0.3x | 7 | Compare |
| Equifax | FY25 | 6.9% | 18.0% | 18.7% | 8.4% | 2.7x | 6 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 1,810 | 1,808 | 2,028 | 2,353 | 2,461 | 2,776 | 3,029 | 3,489 | 3,699 | 3,789 |
| Revenue growth | 1.8% | −0.1% | 12.2% | 16.0% | 4.6% | 12.8% | 9.1% | 15.2% | 6.0% | 2.4% |
| Gross profit | 600 | 592 | 700 | 818 | 789 | 861 | 963 | 1,135 | 1,182 | 1,218 |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | 142 | 109 | 226 | 306 | 283 | 312 | 304 | 378 | 347 | 389 |
| Net income | 86 | 108 | 151 | 217 | 211 | 235 | 236 | 275 | 280 | 271 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 2.05 | 2.75 | 3.93 | 5.69 | 5.67 | 6.65 | 6.58 | 7.71 | 7.81 | 8.24 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 42 | 39 | 38 | 38 | 37 | 35 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 33 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 234 | 148 | 231 | 218 | 327 | 356 | 189 | 224 | 395 | 152 |
| Capital expenditure | 29 | 32 | 32 | 42 | 35 | 69 | 53 | 50 | 35 | 58 |
| Free cash flow | 205 | 116 | 198 | 176 | 292 | 287 | 135 | 175 | 360 | 94 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 22 | 168 | 56 | 106 | 354 | 46 | 85 | 21 | 10 | 859 |
| Acquisitions | 1 | 9 | 0 | 19 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 17 | 16 | 16 | 18 | 23 | 23 | 25 | 30 | 38 | 39 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 216 | 190 | 312 | 369 | 295 | 494 | 492 | 329 | 660 | 265 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 366 | 396 | 266 | 276 | 286 | 297 | 315 | 0 | 0 | 365 |
| Total assets | 2,225 | 2,257 | 2,379 | 2,783 | 2,777 | 3,101 | 3,241 | 3,326 | 3,597 | 3,490 |
| Total liabilities | 1,018 | 1,065 | 1,030 | 1,294 | 1,377 | 1,518 | 1,560 | 1,344 | 1,338 | 1,757 |
| Shareholders' equity | 1,207 | 1,192 | 1,349 | 1,489 | 1,400 | 1,583 | 1,682 | 1,981 | 2,258 | 1,734 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 33.1% | 32.8% | 34.5% | 34.8% | 32.0% | 31.0% | 31.8% | 32.5% | 32.0% | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | 7.8% | 6.0% | 11.1% | 13.0% | 11.5% | 11.2% | 10.0% | 10.8% | 9.4% | 10.3% |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 6.0% | 7.4% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 7.9% | 7.6% | 7.2% |
| Free cash flow margin | 11.3% | 6.4% | 9.8% | 7.5% | 11.9% | 10.3% | 4.5% | 5.0% | 9.7% | 2.5% |
| Return on capital | 6.7% | 7.9% | 12.1% | 17.0% | 16.3% | 17.7% | 16.6% | 18.3% | 17.1% | 16.6% |
| Return on equity | 7.3% | 9.0% | 11.9% | 15.3% | 14.6% | 15.8% | 14.4% | 15.0% | 13.2% | 13.6% |
| Return on assets | 3.8% | 4.8% | 6.5% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 8.0% | 7.4% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 7.6% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.8x | 1.5x | −0.2x | −0.3x | −0.0x | −0.6x | −0.5x | −0.8x | −1.7x | 0.2x |