GitLab
GitLab's revenue rose 25.8% to $955 million in fiscal 2026. Its operating margin was −7.4%, up from −18.8% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $222 million. The diluted share count rose 3.9%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on equity is net income as a share of shareholders' equity. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What GitLab does
GitLab sells a software platform that software teams use to plan, build, test, secure and release their code. This kind of work is called DevSecOps. The platform brings these steps together in one product, and GitLab adds artificial intelligence (AI) features that can carry out some tasks for the team.
GitLab uses an open-core model. Its core product is open to outside contributors, and it sells paid versions with more features. Customers can run GitLab themselves on their own servers or in their own cloud, use a hosted software-as-a-service version run by GitLab, or use a single-tenant hosted version, GitLab Dedicated, for organizations with strict security needs. It counts a customer as a "Base Customer" once the customer pays more than $5,000 in annual recurring revenue.
GitLab says it faces strong competition and that it has a history of losses. Its 10-K also lists risks from the code it runs for customers and from the AI features in its products.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- A history of losses, with higher operating costs expected, and no promise of lasting profit.
- Strong competition that could cost it market share.
- Security breaches, made more likely by running customers' code and using open source parts.
- Growth that may slow, and difficulty managing the growth it has had.
- AI features that could give wrong or unsafe output and lead to harm to its reputation or to claims.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
GitLab lost money in fiscal 2026: a net loss of $56 million.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value GitLab yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from GitLab's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from GitLab's cash from operations minus depreciation in fiscal 2026 (free cash flow before spending to grow: capital spending was 3.3 times depreciation, which holds its free cash flow down) of $230M, net cash of $1.3B at January 31, 2026 and 167 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to GitLab: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 31.1% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Application Software), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $9.6B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2026); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $56.65
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
The P/E method needs positive earnings, and GitLab's latest diluted earnings per share were negative or zero.
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 935 | 937 | 1,036 | 992 | 1,260 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −935 | −937 | −1,036 | −992 | −1,260 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Interest coverage | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current ratio | 4.3x | 3.6x | 1.9x | 2.5x | 2.5x |
| Quick ratio | 4.3x | 3.6x | 1.9x | 2.5x | 2.5x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $376,052 of GitLab shares on the open market, and 6 insiders sold $172.8 million, $129.1 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 116,200 | $53.27 | $6.2 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 430,000 | $45.84 | $19.7 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 28, 2026 | Sivaprasad PadisettyChief Technology Officer | Sold plan | 51,915 | $45.78 | $2.4 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 25, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 705,490 | $47.75 | $33.7 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 24, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 980,710 | $48.63 | $47.7 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Simon MundyChief Accounting Officer | Sold plan | 8,725 | $38.00 | $331,550 | Form 4 |
| Jun 30, 2026 | William StaplesChief Executive Officer, Director | Bought plan | 4,188 | $29.36 | $122,960 | Form 4 |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 116,200 | $28.44 | $3.3 million | Form 4 |
| May 18, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 116,200 | $24.85 | $2.9 million | Form 4 |
| Apr 15, 2026 | Sytse SijbrandijDirector | Sold plan | 116,200 | $20.77 | $2.4 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | William StaplesChief Executive Officer, Director | Bought plan | 6,010 | $21.35 | $128,342 | Form 4 |
| Mar 27, 2026 | Susan L BostromDirector | Sold | 32,500 | $20.36 | $661,700 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 4 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 4 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −37.0% | 4.2% | −18.5% |
Compare
Put GitLab side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GitLab | FY26 | 25.8% | −7.4% | 23.2% | — | — | 4 | |
| AppFolio | FY25 | 19.7% | 16.1% | 25.1% | 50.2% | −1.4x | 4 | Compare |
| SentinelOne | FY26 | 21.9% | −32.1% | 7.6% | −28.9% | — | 3 | Compare |
| Clear Secure | FY25 | 16.9% | 20.7% | 38.1% | — | — | — | Compare |
| Manhattan Associates | FY25 | 3.8% | 25.9% | 34.6% | — | −1.1x | 6 | Compare |
7 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||||
| Revenue | 81 | 152 | 253 | 424 | 580 | 759 | 955 |
| Revenue growth | — | 87.3% | 66.0% | 68.0% | 36.7% | 30.9% | 25.8% |
| Gross profit | 72 | 134 | 223 | 373 | 520 | 674 | 834 |
| Research and development | 59 | 107 | 97 | 156 | 201 | 240 | 275 |
| Operating income | −128 | −214 | −129 | −211 | −187 | −143 | −70 |
| Net income | −131 | −192 | −155 | −173 | −426 | −6 | −56 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −2.76 | −3.82 | −1.95 | −1.17 | −2.76 | −0.04 | −0.34 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 47 | 50 | 80 | 148 | 154 | 161 | 167 |
| Cash flow | |||||||
| Cash from operations | −60 | −74 | −50 | −77 | 35 | −64 | 233 |
| Capital expenditure | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| Free cash flow | −60 | −74 | −53 | −83 | 33 | −68 | 222 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 41 | 112 | 30 | 123 | 163 | 186 | 215 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | |||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 343 | 283 | 935 | 937 | 1,036 | 992 | 1,260 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total assets | — | 363 | 1,091 | 1,169 | 1,321 | 1,399 | 1,723 |
| Total liabilities | — | 169 | 292 | 344 | 715 | 578 | 686 |
| Shareholders' equity | −135 | −231 | 775 | 771 | 560 | 776 | 991 |
| Margins and ratios | |||||||
| Gross margin | 88.5% | 87.9% | 88.1% | 87.8% | 89.7% | 88.8% | 87.4% |
| Operating margin | −158.0% | −140.6% | −51.0% | −49.8% | −32.3% | −18.8% | −7.4% |
| Net margin | −161.0% | −126.3% | −61.4% | −40.9% | −73.4% | −0.8% | −5.9% |
| Free cash flow margin | −74.1% | −48.4% | −21.1% | −19.7% | 5.8% | −8.9% | 23.2% |
| Return on capital | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equity | — | — | −57.1% | −22.4% | −64.0% | −0.9% | −6.3% |
| Return on assets | — | — | −21.3% | −15.3% | −34.2% | −0.5% | −3.6% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |