MillerKnoll
MillerKnoll's revenue rose 4.7% to $3.8 billion in fiscal 2026. Its operating margin was 5.2%, up from 1.4% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $78 million, down 23.7%. It paid out $51 million in dividends and buybacks, 66% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 0.5%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2017 to 2026, earnings per share fell 4.8% a year and net income 3.3% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 14% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value MillerKnoll yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from MillerKnoll's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from MillerKnoll's fiscal 2026 free cash flow of $78M, net cash of −$1.1B at May 30, 2026 and 69 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to MillerKnoll: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -2.0% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Office Services & Supplies), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $1.5B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2025); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target. A negative value means MillerKnoll's net debt is larger than what that scenario's cash flows are worth today.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $21.07
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from MillerKnoll's earnings per share of $1.41 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 20×, the middle of MillerKnoll's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $21.07
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- MillerKnoll's P/E at the last close
- 14.9×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| MoogMOG-A | $358.27 | $11.76 | 30.5× |
| MSA SafetyMSA | $182.57 | $8.04 | 22.7× |
| A. O. SmithAOS | $61.91 | $3.60 | 17.2× |
| MillerKnollMLKN | $21.07 | $1.41 | 14.9× |
| Pitney BowesPBI | $17.26 | $1.23 | 14.0× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 230 | 224 | 230 | 194 | 168 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 1,408 | 1,398 | 1,292 | 1,311 | 1,261 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 1,178 | 1,175 | 1,061 | 1,117 | 1,093 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 5.1x | 4.2x | 3.3x | 5.8x | 3.1x |
| Debt to equity | 1.0x | 1.0x | 0.9x | 1.0x | 0.9x |
| Interest coverage | 1.1x | 1.6x | 2.2x | 0.7x | 2.8x |
| Current ratio | 1.5x | 1.7x | 1.5x | 1.6x | 1.6x |
| Quick ratio | 0.8x | 1.0x | 0.9x | 0.9x | 0.9x |
Insider trades
No officer, director or 10% owner of MillerKnoll reported buying or selling its shares on the open market between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026.
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 7 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −6.5% | −6.2% | −2.7% |
Compare
Put MillerKnoll side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MillerKnoll | FY26 | 4.7% | 5.2% | 2.0% | 6.1% | 3.1x | 7 | |
| Pitney Bowes | FY25 | −6.6% | — | 16.8% | 27.7% | 3.9x | 6 | Compare |
| MSA Safety | FY25 | 3.7% | 19.8% | 15.8% | 17.3% | 0.9x | 6 | Compare |
| A. O. Smith | FY25 | 0.3% | 19.0% | 14.3% | 30.7% | −0.1x | 7 | Compare |
| Moog | FY25 | 7.0% | 11.7% | 3.3% | 11.7% | 1.8x | 7 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 2,278 | 2,381 | 2,567 | 2,487 | 2,465 | 3,946 | 4,087 | 3,628 | 3,670 | 3,842 |
| Revenue growth | 0.6% | 4.5% | 7.8% | −3.1% | −0.9% | 60.1% | 3.6% | −11.2% | 1.1% | 4.7% |
| Gross profit | 864 | 873 | 930 | 911 | 951 | 1,353 | 1,430 | 1,420 | 1,423 | 1,489 |
| Research and development | 59 | 57 | 59 | 54 | 72 | 109 | 106 | 93 | 94 | 100 |
| Operating income | 191 | 179 | 204 | −38 | 232 | 40 | 122 | 167 | 50 | 198 |
| Net income | 124 | 128 | 160 | −9 | 175 | −27 | 42 | 82 | −37 | 92 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 2.05 | 2.12 | 2.70 | −0.15 | 2.94 | −0.37 | 0.55 | 1.11 | −0.54 | 1.32 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 61 | 60 | 59 | 59 | 59 | 73 | 76 | 74 | 69 | 69 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 202 | 166 | 216 | 222 | 332 | −12 | 163 | 352 | 209 | 200 |
| Capital expenditure | 87 | 71 | 86 | 69 | 60 | 95 | 83 | 78 | 108 | 122 |
| Free cash flow | 115 | 96 | 131 | 153 | 272 | −107 | 80 | 274 | 102 | 78 |
| Dividends paid | 39 | 42 | 46 | 36 | 34 | 54 | 57 | 56 | 52 | 51 |
| Share buybacks | 24 | 46 | 48 | 27 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 138 | 85 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 111 | 0 | 1,088 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 9 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 31 | 20 | 21 | 32 | 26 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 105 | 212 | 168 | 461 | 404 | 230 | 224 | 230 | 194 | 168 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 210 | 286 | 292 | 591 | 277 | 1,408 | 1,398 | 1,292 | 1,311 | 1,261 |
| Total assets | 1,306 | 1,480 | 1,569 | 2,054 | 2,077 | 4,514 | 4,275 | 4,044 | 3,950 | 4,000 |
| Total liabilities | 694 | 784 | 830 | 1,360 | 1,139 | 2,980 | 2,735 | 2,585 | 2,615 | 2,595 |
| Shareholders' equity | 588 | 665 | 719 | 652 | 860 | 1,427 | 1,433 | 1,385 | 1,276 | 1,343 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 37.9% | 36.7% | 36.2% | 36.6% | 38.6% | 34.3% | 35.0% | 39.1% | 38.8% | 38.8% |
| Operating margin | 8.4% | 7.5% | 7.9% | −1.5% | 9.4% | 1.0% | 3.0% | 4.6% | 1.4% | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 5.4% | 6.2% | −0.3% | 7.1% | −0.7% | 1.0% | 2.3% | −1.0% | 2.4% |
| Free cash flow margin | 5.0% | 4.0% | 5.1% | 6.1% | 11.1% | −2.7% | 1.9% | 7.5% | 2.8% | 2.0% |
| Return on capital | 19.6% | 18.7% | 20.5% | −3.7% | 24.5% | 1.9% | 4.3% | 5.6% | 1.6% | 6.1% |
| Return on equity | 22.3% | 20.5% | 23.2% | −1.3% | 23.1% | −2.4% | 2.9% | 5.8% | −2.8% | 7.0% |
| Return on assets | 9.8% | 9.2% | 10.5% | −0.5% | 8.4% | −0.8% | 1.0% | 2.0% | −0.9% | 2.3% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.4x | 0.3x | 0.5x | 3.1x | −0.4x | 5.1x | 4.2x | 3.3x | 5.8x | 3.1x |