3M
3M's revenue rose 1.5% to $24.9 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 18.6%, down from 19.6% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $1.4 billion, up 118.8%. It paid out $4.8 billion in dividends and buybacks, 345% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 2.0%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What 3M does
3M makes a wide range of industrial and household products. They include sandpaper and other abrasives, industrial tapes and adhesives, electrical products, respirators, hearing and fall protection, and roofing granules; films, ceramics and other materials for cars, aircraft, electronics, chips, data centers and road signs; and household brands such as Scotch tape, Post-it notes, Command hooks, Filtrete air filters, Scotch-Brite sponges and Nexcare bandages. It sells directly to users and through wholesalers, retailers, distributors and dealers in many countries.
3M reports three segments: Safety and Industrial, Transportation and Electronics, and Consumer. In 2025, sales in Safety and Industrial rose 3.9 percent. The Americas made up just over half of its sales, with the rest coming from Asia Pacific and from Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The company says most of its products face competition from other technology-driven manufacturers.
3M was incorporated in 1929 to continue a business begun in 1902. In April 2024 it spun off its health care business as a separate company, Solventum. It finished exiting the manufacture of PFAS, a family of long-lasting chemicals, by the end of 2025, but still faces lawsuits and regulation over them. At the end of 2025 it employed about 60,500 people, about 22,500 of them in the United States.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Large liabilities from lawsuits and regulation over PFAS chemicals it made, including its settlement with US water suppliers.
- Risks tied to the settlement over its Combat Arms earplugs, sold by its Aearo subsidiaries.
- Tariffs, trade disputes and changing economic and political conditions around the world.
- Failing to bring new products to market on time or win customers for them.
- Risks from the spin-off of Solventum, its former health care business.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share fell 3.4% a year and net income 4.8% a year, while buybacks cut the share count by 13%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value 3M yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from 3M's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from 3M's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $1.4B, net cash of −$6.7B at December 31, 2025 and 541 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to 3M: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -1.6% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 10%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Industrial Conglomerates), plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2023); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $172.79
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from 3M's earnings per share of $6.71 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 25.8×, the middle of 3M's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (3M's own P/E today) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 11%, 10% and 9%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $172.79
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- 3M's P/E at the last close
- 25.8×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waste ManagementWM | $241.02 | $7.06 | 34.1× |
| 3MMMM | $172.79 | $6.71 | 25.8× |
| Carlisle CompaniesCSL | $345.97 | $17.47 | 19.8× |
| Honeywell TechnologiesHON | $219.28 | $14.72 | 14.9× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 4.8 | 3.9 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 5.9 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 17.4 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 13.0 | 12.6 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 12.7 | 12.1 | 8.3 | 5.3 | 6.7 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 1.4x | 2.0x | — | 0.9x | 1.1x |
| Debt to equity | 1.2x | 1.1x | 3.0x | 3.4x | 2.7x |
| Interest coverage | 15.1x | 9.5x | −11.3x | 4.0x | 4.9x |
| Current ratio | 1.7x | 1.5x | 1.1x | 1.4x | 1.7x |
| Quick ratio | 1.1x | 1.0x | 0.8x | 1.1x | 1.3x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought 3M shares on the open market, and 7 insiders sold $21.0 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2026 | Rodriguez Beatriz Karina ChavezGroup President | Sold | 3,635 | $182.51 | $663,424 | Form 4 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | John Patrick BanovetzExecutive Vice President | Sold | 7,880 | $170.44 | $1.3 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 23, 2026 | Theresa E ReinsethSr Vice President & CAO | Sold | 924 | $169.42 | $156,544 | Form 4 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | Kevin H RhodesEVP, Chief Legal Off & Secret | Sold | 7,669 | $171.20 | $1.3 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 22, 2026 | Christian T Goralski JRGroup President | Sold | 4,902 | $170.46 | $835,595 | Form 4 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Theresa E ReinsethSr Vice President & CAO | Sold | 5,145 | $172.75 | $888,796 | Form 4 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | Zoe L DicksonEVP & Chief HR Officer | Sold | 25,055 | $170.34 | $4.3 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | Zoe L DicksonEVP & Chief HR Officer | Sold | 20,519 | $169.97 | $3.5 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 9, 2026 | Rodriguez Beatriz Karina ChavezGroup President | Sold | 1,190 | $171.13 | $203,645 | Form 4 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | Zoe L DicksonEVP & Chief HR Officer | Sold | 13,826 | $169.78 | $2.3 million | Form 4 |
| Nov 13, 2025 | Zoe L DicksonEVP & Chief HR Officer | Sold | 13,629 | $169.83 | $2.3 million | Form 4 |
| Oct 29, 2025 | Mark W. MurphyEVP & Chief Info Digital Off | Sold | 19,061 | $166.55 | $3.2 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| F-score | 4 of 9 | 7 of 9 | 5 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −28.2% | 5.2% | 2.4% |
Compare
Put 3M side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3M | FY25 | 1.5% | 18.6% | 5.6% | 34.2% | 1.1x | 5 | |
| Honeywell Technologies | FY25 | 7.8% | 21.7% | 14.5% | 17.1% | 2.3x | 4 | Compare |
| DuPont | FY25 | 1.9% | — | 3.3% | 1.1% | 2.1x | 6 | Compare |
| Carlisle Companies | FY25 | 0.3% | 20.0% | 19.3% | 21.9% | 1.5x | 6 | Compare |
| Waste Management | FY25 | 14.2% | 17.1% | 11.2% | 10.9% | 3.1x | 6 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 30.1 | 31.7 | 32.8 | 32.1 | 32.2 | 35.4 | 26.2 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 24.9 |
| Revenue growth | −0.6% | 5.1% | 3.5% | −1.9% | 0.1% | 9.8% | −26.0% | −5.9% | −0.1% | 1.5% |
| Gross profit | 15.0 | 15.6 | 16.1 | 15.0 | 15.6 | 16.6 | 10.3 | 9.6 | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| Research and development | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | — |
| Operating income | 7.0 | 7.7 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 7.2 | 7.4 | 4.4 | −10.7 | 4.8 | 4.6 |
| Net income | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.3 | 4.5 | 5.4 | 5.9 | 5.8 | −7.0 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 8.16 | 7.93 | 8.89 | 7.72 | 9.36 | 10.12 | 10.18 | −12.63 | 7.55 | 6.00 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 619 | 613 | 602 | 585 | 582 | 585 | 568 | 554 | 552 | 541 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 6.7 | 6.2 | 6.4 | 7.1 | 8.1 | 7.5 | 5.6 | 6.7 | 1.8 | 2.3 |
| Capital expenditure | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 |
| Free cash flow | 5.2 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 5.4 | 6.6 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Dividends paid | 2.7 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Share buybacks | 3.8 | 2.1 | 4.9 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 1.8 | 3.3 |
| Acquisitions | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 2.4 | 4.1 | 3.2 | — | 5.0 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 6.0 | 7.7 | 5.9 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 11.5 | 13.2 | 14.2 | 19.5 | 18.9 | 17.4 | 16.0 | 14.2 | 13.0 | 12.6 |
| Total assets | 32.9 | 38.0 | 36.5 | 44.7 | 47.3 | 47.1 | 46.5 | 50.6 | 39.9 | 37.7 |
| Total liabilities | 22.6 | 26.4 | 26.7 | 34.5 | 34.4 | 32.0 | 31.7 | 45.7 | 36.0 | 33.0 |
| Shareholders' equity | 10.3 | 11.6 | 9.8 | 10.1 | 12.9 | 15.0 | 14.7 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.7 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 49.8% | 49.3% | 49.1% | 46.7% | 48.4% | 46.8% | 39.4% | 39.1% | 41.2% | 39.9% |
| Operating margin | 23.3% | 24.3% | 22.0% | 19.2% | 22.2% | 20.8% | 16.7% | −43.4% | 19.6% | 18.6% |
| Net margin | 16.8% | 15.3% | 16.3% | 14.1% | 16.9% | 16.8% | 22.1% | −28.4% | 17.0% | 13.0% |
| Free cash flow margin | 17.4% | 15.4% | 14.8% | 16.7% | 20.5% | 16.6% | 14.7% | 20.6% | 2.6% | 5.6% |
| Return on capital | 25.9% | 24.7% | 26.6% | — | — | 22.2% | 15.3% | −42.2% | 36.0% | 34.2% |
| Return on equity | 46.5% | 44.4% | 50.1% | 45.5% | 47.5% | 42.4% | 38.8% | −71.6% | 96.5% | 76.1% |
| Return on assets | 15.3% | 13.7% | 14.4% | 11.1% | 11.8% | 12.5% | 12.3% | −14.4% | 9.2% | 8.4% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 1.1x | 1.0x | 1.3x | — | 1.5x | 1.4x | 2.0x | — | 0.9x | 1.1x |