Tidewater
Tidewater's revenue rose 0.5% to $1.4 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 20.9%, down from 23.1% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $353 million, up 38.6%. It paid out $90 million in dividends and buybacks, 26% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 5.0%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2023 to 2025, earnings per share grew 90.0% a year and net income 85.6% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 5%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Tidewater yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Tidewater's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Tidewater's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $353M, net cash of −$116M at December 31, 2025 and 50 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Tidewater: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 27.8% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 13%: 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Oil & Gas Equipment & Services), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $4.2B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2022); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $84.49
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Tidewater's earnings per share of $4.90 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 17.2×, the middle of Tidewater's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (Tidewater's own P/E today) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 14%, 13% and 12%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $84.49
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Tidewater's P/E at the last close
- 17.2×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPCRES | $6.38 | $0.10 | 63.8× |
| Kodiak Gas ServicesKGS | $45.45 | $0.84 | 54.1× |
| TidewaterTDW | $84.49 | $4.90 | 17.2× |
| ArchrockAROC | $29.97 | $1.86 | 16.1× |
| Bristow GroupVTOL | $40.30 | $3.47 | 11.6× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 149 | 164 | 274 | 325 | 579 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 168 | 169 | 734 | 648 | 694 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 19 | 5 | 460 | 323 | 116 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | 0.0x | 1.5x | 0.7x | 0.3x |
| Debt to equity | 0.2x | 0.2x | 0.7x | 0.6x | 0.5x |
| Interest coverage | −6.1x | 1.5x | 3.7x | 4.2x | 4.3x |
| Current ratio | 2.2x | 1.9x | 1.8x | 2.1x | 2.9x |
| Quick ratio | 2.2x | 1.9x | 1.8x | 2.1x | 2.9x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Tidewater shares on the open market, and 4 insiders sold $9.5 million, $3.8 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | Robert RobottiDirector | Sold | 10,300 | $89.85 | $925,455 | Form 4 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | Daniel A. HudsonEVP, CLO & Corporate Secretary | Sold plan | 15,000 | $99.08 | $1.5 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 2, 2026 | Kenneth TraubDirector | Sold | 10,000 | $99.00 | $990,000 | Form 4 |
| Aug 12, 2026 | Samuel R RubioEVP, CFO & CAO | Sold | 17,705 | $91.56 | $1.6 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | Daniel A. HudsonEVP, CLO & Corporate Secretary | Sold plan | 5,000 | $89.01 | $445,050 | Form 4 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | Samuel R RubioEVP, CFO & CAO | Sold | 22,461 | $80.05 | $1.8 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 5, 2026 | Daniel A. HudsonEVP & General Counsel | Sold | 5,195 | $80.56 | $418,509 | Form 4 |
| Feb 23, 2026 | Daniel A. HudsonEVP & General Counsel | Sold plan | 15,000 | $77.50 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 11, 2026 | Daniel A. HudsonEVP & General Counsel | Sold plan | 10,000 | $70.01 | $700,100 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| F-score | 5 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 7 of 8 |
| Accruals ratio | −0.4% | −4.9% | −2.0% |
Compare
Put Tidewater side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tidewater | FY25 | 0.5% | 20.9% | 26.1% | 19.4% | 0.3x | 7 | |
| Kodiak Gas Services | FY25 | 12.8% | 26.0% | 21.7% | 6.3% | 4.2x | 5 | Compare |
| Archrock | FY25 | 28.7% | — | 8.0% | 12.1% | 2.9x | 7 | Compare |
| Bristow Group | FY25 | 5.3% | 10.7% | 3.8% | 9.8% | 1.7x | 6 | Compare |
| RPC | FY25 | 14.9% | 2.8% | 3.2% | — | −0.8x | — | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 979 | 602 | 406 | 486 | 397 | 371 | 648 | 1,010 | 1,346 | 1,353 |
| Revenue growth | −34.5% | −38.5% | −32.4% | 19.7% | −18.4% | −6.5% | 74.6% | 55.9% | 33.2% | 0.5% |
| Gross profit | 70 | −59 | 6 | 7 | −30 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | −70 | −578 | −108 | −87 | −187 | −95 | 27 | 182 | 311 | 283 |
| Net income | −160 | −660 | −172 | −142 | −196 | −129 | −22 | 97 | 181 | 335 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −3.41 | −14.02 | −6.45 | −3.71 | −4.86 | −3.14 | −0.49 | 1.84 | 3.40 | 6.64 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 47 | 47 | 27 | 38 | 40 | 41 | 44 | 53 | 53 | 50 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 253 | 30 | 4 | −31 | 4 | 15 | 40 | 104 | 282 | 379 |
| Capital expenditure | 194 | 26 | 21 | 18 | 15 | 9 | 17 | 32 | 28 | 26 |
| Free cash flow | 59 | 4 | −17 | −49 | −11 | 6 | 24 | 73 | 255 | 353 |
| Dividends paid | 35 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 91 | 90 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 594 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 13 | 3 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 14 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 678 | 706 | 372 | 218 | 150 | 149 | 164 | 274 | 325 | 579 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 2,052 | — | 432 | 298 | 193 | 168 | 169 | 734 | 648 | 694 |
| Total assets | 4,984 | 4,191 | 1,828 | 1,580 | 1,251 | 1,096 | 1,298 | 2,063 | 2,075 | 2,387 |
| Total liabilities | 2,678 | 2,540 | 683 | 563 | 428 | 394 | 432 | 1,025 | 964 | 1,026 |
| Shareholders' equity | 2,300 | 1,635 | 1,144 | 1,015 | 822 | 701 | 866 | 1,039 | 1,114 | 1,365 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 7.1% | −9.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | −7.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | −7.1% | −96.0% | −26.4% | −17.8% | −47.0% | −25.6% | 4.1% | 18.0% | 23.1% | 20.9% |
| Net margin | −16.4% | −109.7% | −42.2% | −29.1% | −49.4% | −34.8% | −3.4% | 9.6% | 13.4% | 24.7% |
| Free cash flow margin | 6.0% | 0.7% | −4.3% | −10.2% | −2.8% | 1.6% | 3.6% | 7.2% | 18.9% | 26.1% |
| Return on capital | −1.4% | — | — | −6.0% | −15.0% | −9.5% | 2.6% | 10.6% | 16.6% | 19.4% |
| Return on equity | −6.7% | −33.6% | −12.3% | −13.1% | −21.4% | −16.9% | −2.8% | 10.2% | 16.8% | 27.0% |
| Return on assets | −3.3% | −14.4% | −5.7% | −8.3% | −13.9% | −11.0% | −1.8% | 5.8% | 8.7% | 15.0% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 12.2x | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0x | 1.5x | 0.7x | 0.3x |