The Filing Desk

Celanese vs RPM International

Celanese CE · RPM International RPM · Specialty Chemicals

Celanese reported revenue of $9.5 billion in fiscal 2025, 1.2 times RPM International's $7.9 billion in fiscal 2026. Celanese's revenue fell 7.0% in its latest year, and RPM International's grew 6.7%. Free cash flow was $803 million at Celanese and $675 million at RPM International. Their fiscal years end in different months (December 31 and May 31), so the periods don't line up exactly.

Side by side

CelaneseRPM International
Latest fiscal yearFY2025, Dec 31, 2025FY2026, May 31, 2026
Revenue$9.5B$7.9B
Revenue growth−7.0%6.7%
Revenue growth a year, last 5 years11.0%5.2%
Gross margin20.4%41.4%
Operating margin−8.2%—
Net margin−12.2%8.4%
Free cash flow$803M$675M
Free cash flow margin8.4%8.6%
Return on capital−3.7%13.9%
Net debt to EBITDA—1.9x
Dividends and buybacks$13M$349M
Change in diluted share count0.2%−0.5%
Last close$48.08$97.94
P/E at the last close—18.1×
Insider trades, last 12 monthsbought $593,258, sold $0sold $505,473
Piotroski F-score5 of 96 of 9
Amounts in each company's own currency, US$ unless marked (a foreign company may report in another), each company's latest fiscal year from its 10-K, or 20-F or 40-F for a foreign company. Growth rates compare with the year before; the five-year rate is the average a year. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending; return on capital is after-tax operating income over the money invested in the business; P/E is the last close over the latest earnings per share. Banks are measured differently (return on equity, efficiency ratio), so some rows apply to one company only.

Ten years

Revenue
US$ billions, fiscal years
CelaneseRPM International
Operating margin
Percent of revenue
CelaneseRPM International
Free cash flow
US$ billions. Cash from operations minus capital expenditure.
CelaneseRPM International

Start a new comparison

Source: the companies' Form 10-K filings, from SEC EDGAR, and the last close. For information only, not investment advice: the figures describe results, not which company is the better investment. The Filing Desk is not affiliated with either company. Full figures on the Celanese and RPM International pages.