FIGS vs Fossil
Fossil reported revenue of $1.0 billion in fiscal 2025, 1.6 times FIGS's $631 million in fiscal 2025. FIGS's revenue grew 13.6% in its latest year, and Fossil's fell 12.3%. FIGS had an operating margin of 6.0%, against -1.9% at Fossil. Free cash flow was $53 million at FIGS and −$60 million at Fossil. Their fiscal years end in different months (December 31 and January 3), so the periods don't line up exactly.
Side by side
| FIGS | Fossil | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest fiscal year | FY2025, Dec 31, 2025 | FY2025, Jan 3, 2026 |
| Revenue | $631M | $1.0B |
| Revenue growth | 13.6% | −12.3% |
| Revenue growth a year, last 5 years | 19.1% | −9.0% |
| Gross margin | 66.5% | 56.1% |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | −1.9% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | −7.8% |
| Free cash flow | $53M | −$60M |
| Free cash flow margin | 8.4% | −6.0% |
| Return on capital | — | −8.7% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $3M | $0M |
| Change in diluted share count | −0.3% | 2.1% |
| Last close | $19.82 | $7.81 |
| P/E at the last close | 52.2× | — |
| Insider trades, last 12 months | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | — | 4 of 9 |
Amounts in each company's own currency, US$ unless marked (a foreign company may report in another), each company's latest fiscal year from its 10-K, or 20-F or 40-F for a foreign company. Growth rates compare with the year before; the five-year rate is the average a year. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending; return on capital is after-tax operating income over the money invested in the business; P/E is the last close over the latest earnings per share. Banks are measured differently (return on equity, efficiency ratio), so some rows apply to one company only.
Ten years
Revenue
US$ billions, fiscal years
FIGSFossil
Operating margin
Percent of revenue
FIGSFossil
Free cash flow
US$ billions. Cash from operations minus capital expenditure.
FIGSFossil