Fossil vs Movado
Fossil reported revenue of $1.0 billion in fiscal 2025, 1.5 times Movado's $671 million in fiscal 2026. Fossil's revenue fell 12.3% in its latest year, and Movado's grew 2.7%. Fossil had an operating margin of -1.9%, against 4.4% at Movado. Free cash flow was −$60 million at Fossil and $53 million at Movado. Their fiscal years end in different months (January 3 and January 31), so the periods don't line up exactly.
Side by side
| Fossil | Movado | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest fiscal year | FY2025, Jan 3, 2026 | FY2026, Jan 31, 2026 |
| Revenue | $1.0B | $671M |
| Revenue growth | −12.3% | 2.7% |
| Revenue growth a year, last 5 years | −9.0% | 5.8% |
| Gross margin | 56.1% | 54.2% |
| Operating margin | −1.9% | 4.4% |
| Net margin | −7.8% | 4.0% |
| Free cash flow | −$60M | $53M |
| Free cash flow margin | −6.0% | 8.0% |
| Return on capital | −8.7% | — |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — |
| Dividends and buybacks | $0M | $35M |
| Change in diluted share count | 2.1% | 0.1% |
| Last close | $7.81 | $31.03 |
| P/E at the last close | — | 17.2× |
| Insider trades, last 12 months | — | — |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 of 9 | — |
Amounts in each company's own currency, US$ unless marked (a foreign company may report in another), each company's latest fiscal year from its 10-K, or 20-F or 40-F for a foreign company. Growth rates compare with the year before; the five-year rate is the average a year. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending; return on capital is after-tax operating income over the money invested in the business; P/E is the last close over the latest earnings per share. Banks are measured differently (return on equity, efficiency ratio), so some rows apply to one company only.
Ten years
Revenue
US$ billions, fiscal years
FossilMovado
Operating margin
Percent of revenue
FossilMovado
Free cash flow
US$ billions. Cash from operations minus capital expenditure.
FossilMovado