Bloom Energy
Bloom Energy's revenue rose 37.3% to $2.0 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 3.6%, up from 1.6% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $57 million, up 72.5%. It paid out $1 million in dividends and buybacks, 2% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 5.7%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What Bloom Energy does
Bloom Energy makes fuel cell systems that produce electricity on the customer's own site. Its main product, the Bloom Energy Server, uses a solid-oxide fuel cell to turn fuels such as natural gas, biogas and hydrogen into electricity without burning them. It also sells the Bloom Electrolyzer, which makes hydrogen. It is based in Silicon Valley, makes its systems in the United States and employs more than 2,000 people.
Its customers are large companies, including those running data centers, semiconductor factories, artificial intelligence infrastructure and utilities. Its Energy Server systems are in use at about 1,100 sites in 9 countries. Most of its revenue comes from selling Energy Server systems, with additional recurring revenue from long-term operations and maintenance agreements.
Bloom says demand for power is rising because of data centers and artificial intelligence, and that grid limits and permitting delays are slowing new power connections. It says this is pushing some customers toward generating power onsite. It also notes that its systems cost a lot up front, so some customers need outside financing to buy them.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Markets for onsite power and hydrogen are new and may not gain wide acceptance.
- Long sales and installation cycles, and high upfront costs that depend on outside financing for some customers.
- Growing concentration of customers in AI data centers.
- Dependence on fuel prices and on fuel supply and utility connection rules.
- Trade tariffs, and reliance on suppliers and sole-source equipment.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
Bloom Energy lost money in fiscal 2025: a net loss of $87 million.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Bloom Energy yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
What Bloom Energy says to expect
- Full year 2026: revenue
Raises full year 2026 revenue guidance to $4.4 billion - $4.6 billion, representing 122% year-over-year growth at the midpoint
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Bloom Energy's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Bloom Energy's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $57M, net cash of −$173M at December 31, 2025 and 240 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Bloom Energy: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 19.1% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 10%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Electrical Components & Equipment), plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2025); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $203.92
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Bloom Energy's earnings per share of $1.64 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 26.9×, the middle of Bloom Energy's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 11%, 10% and 9%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $203.92
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Bloom Energy's P/E at the last close
- 124.3×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloom EnergyBE | $203.92 | $1.64 | 124.3× |
| Sensata TechnologiesST | $40.69 | $0.60 | 67.8× |
| WoodwardWWD | $305.66 | $8.99 | 34.0× |
| NextpowerNXT | $76.48 | $3.87 | 19.8× |
| EnerSysENS | $169.38 | $9.34 | 18.1× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 396 | 348 | 665 | 803 | 2,454 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 530 | 415 | 850 | 1,247 | 2,627 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 134 | 66 | 185 | 444 | 173 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | 5.8x | 1.4x |
| Debt to equity | — | 1.2x | 1.7x | 2.2x | 3.4x |
| Interest coverage | −1.7x | −4.9x | −1.9x | 0.4x | 1.4x |
| Current ratio | 2.4x | 1.9x | 3.6x | 3.2x | 6.0x |
| Quick ratio | 1.9x | 1.4x | 2.5x | 2.4x | 5.0x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Bloom Energy shares on the open market, and 11 insiders sold $165.2 million, $98.0 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | Aman JoshiChief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 8,437 | $277.17 | $2.3 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Aman JoshiChief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 3,601 | $269.94 | $972,054 | Form 4 |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Shawn Marie SoderbergSee Remarks | Sold plan | 2,870 | $270.07 | $775,101 | Form 4 |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Satish ChitooriChief Operations Officer | Sold plan | 2,870 | $270.06 | $775,072 | Form 4 |
| Sep 16, 2026 | Maciej KurzymskiChief Accounting Officer | Sold | 2,295 | $268.42 | $616,024 | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Jeffrey R ImmeltDirector | Sold plan | 30,000 | $238.91 | $7.2 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Aman JoshiChief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 4,677 | $241.75 | $1.1 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Shawn Marie SoderbergSee Remarks | Sold | 2,895 | $233.60 | $676,272 | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Satish ChitooriChief Operations Officer | Sold plan | 2,053 | $241.64 | $496,087 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | John T ChambersDirector | Sold plan | 15,000 | $250.00 | $3.8 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | John T ChambersDirector | Sold plan | 15,000 | $205.58 | $3.1 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Aman JoshiChief Commercial Officer | Sold plan | 8,343 | $300.37 | $2.5 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations is positive | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| F-score | 3 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 5 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | 3.2% | −4.7% | −5.7% |
Compare
Put Bloom Energy side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bloom Energy | FY25 | 37.3% | 3.6% | 2.8% | 5.8% | 1.4x | 5 | |
| Nextpower | FY26 | 20.3% | 19.6% | 14.4% | 54.5% | −1.5x | 3 | Compare |
| Woodward | FY25 | 7.3% | — | 9.5% | 16.8% | 0.6x | 8 | Compare |
| Sensata Technologies | FY25 | −5.8% | 6.4% | 13.2% | 2.2% | 4.7x | 6 | Compare |
| EnerSys | FY26 | 3.7% | 11.4% | 12.5% | 13.7% | 1.2x | 5 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 208 | 366 | 633 | 785 | 794 | 972 | 1,199 | 1,334 | 1,474 | 2,024 |
| Revenue growth | — | 75.3% | 73.0% | 24.1% | 1.2% | 22.4% | 23.3% | 11.2% | 10.5% | 37.3% |
| Gross profit | −104 | −16 | 106 | 98 | 166 | 198 | 148 | 198 | 405 | 587 |
| Research and development | 47 | 51 | 89 | 104 | 84 | 103 | 151 | 156 | 149 | 186 |
| Operating income | −241 | −155 | −165 | −233 | −81 | −114 | −261 | −209 | 23 | 73 |
| Net income | −280 | −276 | −274 | −304 | −158 | −164 | −302 | −302 | −27 | −87 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −27.84 | −26.97 | −5.14 | −2.67 | −1.14 | −0.95 | −1.62 | −1.42 | −0.13 | −0.37 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 10 | 10 | 53 | 115 | 139 | 173 | 186 | 213 | 227 | 240 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | −283 | −92 | −92 | 164 | −99 | −61 | −192 | −372 | 92 | 114 |
| Capital expenditure | 9 | 62 | 45 | 51 | 38 | 50 | 117 | 84 | 59 | 57 |
| Free cash flow | −292 | −153 | −137 | 113 | −137 | −110 | −309 | −456 | 33 | 57 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 28 | 30 | 180 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 218 | 131 | 325 | 203 | 247 | 396 | 348 | 665 | 803 | 2,454 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | — | 941 | 741 | 637 | 391 | 530 | 415 | 850 | 1,247 | 2,627 |
| Total assets | — | 1,221 | 1,522 | 1,323 | 1,454 | 1,726 | 1,947 | 2,414 | 2,657 | 4,397 |
| Total liabilities | — | 1,722 | 1,482 | 1,490 | 1,313 | 1,518 | 1,568 | 1,893 | 2,072 | 3,604 |
| Shareholders' equity | — | −2,180 | −143 | −260 | 79 | −44 | 341 | 502 | 562 | 769 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | −49.6% | −4.5% | 16.7% | 12.4% | 20.9% | 20.3% | 12.4% | 14.8% | 27.5% | 29.0% |
| Operating margin | −115.6% | −42.4% | −26.1% | −29.6% | −10.2% | −11.8% | −21.8% | −15.7% | 1.6% | 3.6% |
| Net margin | −134.1% | −75.6% | −43.2% | −38.8% | −19.8% | −16.9% | −25.2% | −22.7% | −1.9% | −4.3% |
| Free cash flow margin | −139.9% | −42.0% | −21.7% | 14.4% | −17.2% | −11.4% | −25.7% | −34.2% | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Return on capital | — | — | — | −68.2% | −23.2% | −43.4% | −71.5% | −28.7% | 2.1% | 5.8% |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | −203.6% | −71.7% | −5.1% | −13.1% |
| Return on assets | — | — | −19.9% | −21.4% | −11.3% | −10.3% | −16.4% | −13.9% | −1.1% | −2.5% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5.8x | 1.4x |