ConocoPhillips
ConocoPhillips' revenue rose 7.7% to $58.9 billion in fiscal 2025. Its net margin was 13.6%, down from 16.9% a year earlier. It paid out $9.0 billion in dividends and buybacks. The diluted share count rose 6.2%.
Net margin is net income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What ConocoPhillips does
ConocoPhillips is an independent oil and gas producer based in Houston, Texas. It finds and produces crude oil, bitumen (a thick oil from Canadian oil sands), natural gas, natural gas liquids and liquefied natural gas (LNG), and sells them on the world market. Buyers are refiners, utilities and traders. It does not run refineries or gas stations, having split off that part as Phillips 66 in 2012.
It runs five segments, split by region: Alaska; Lower 48 (the contiguous US states); Canada; Europe, Middle East and North Africa; and Asia Pacific. The Lower 48 is the largest, based on 2025 production. Its main US fields are in the Delaware, Eagle Ford, Bakken and Midland basins. In Alaska it holds interests in the Prudhoe Bay and Kuparuk fields and is building the Willow project, where first oil is expected in early 2029.
It has operations in 14 countries. At the end of 2025 it had about 9,900 employees worldwide and total assets of about $122 billion. It says that it competes with other oil and gas producers for exploration rights, talent and equipment.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Oil, gas and NGL prices that swing widely and can stay low for long stretches.
- Failing to replace the resources it produces, which would shrink the business over time.
- Reserve estimates that are imprecise and may be revised.
- Operating hazards and limits on its control over joint ventures it does not run.
- Climate laws and emissions goals that could raise its costs and limit its plans.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2018 to 2025, earnings per share grew 2.6% a year and net income 3.6% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 7% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value ConocoPhillips yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from ConocoPhillips' 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from ConocoPhillips' cash from operations minus depreciation in fiscal 2025 (free cash flow before spending to grow, as its free cash flow was not available) of $8.3B, net cash of −$16.5B at December 31, 2025 and 1,253 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to ConocoPhillips: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -9.1% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 12%: 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Oil & Gas Exploration & Production), plus 1 point for unsteady results (revenue fell in two of the last five years); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $151.37
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from ConocoPhillips' earnings per share of $7.56 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 17.1×, the middle of ConocoPhillips' own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (the Energy median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 13%, 12% and 11%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $151.37
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- ConocoPhillips' P/E at the last close
- 20.0×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diamondback EnergyFANG | $207.13 | $5.26 | 39.4× |
| ConocoPhillipsCOP | $151.37 | $7.56 | 20.0× |
| EOG ResourcesEOG | $163.68 | $12.86 | 12.7× |
| Devon EnergyDVN | $51.64 | $4.21 | 12.3× |
| Occidental PetroleumOXY | $64.07 | $6.46 | 9.9× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | — | 9.2 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 7.0 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 19.9 | 16.6 | 18.9 | 24.3 | 23.4 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | — | 7.4 | 12.3 | 18.2 | 16.5 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | 0.2x | 0.5x | 0.8x | 0.7x |
| Debt to equity | 0.4x | 0.3x | 0.4x | 0.4x | 0.4x |
| Interest coverage | 15.3x | 36.7x | 20.8x | 15.5x | 11.8x |
| Current ratio | 1.3x | 1.5x | 1.4x | 1.3x | 1.3x |
| Quick ratio | 1.2x | 1.4x | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.1x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $500,001 of ConocoPhillips shares on the open market, and 8 insiders sold $145.9 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2026 | Andrew D LundquistSenior Vice President | Sold | 9,487 | $135.15 | $1.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Kelly Brunetti RoseSVP & General Counsel | Sold | 15,000 | $134.52 | $2.0 million | Form 4 |
| Jun 10, 2026 | Sharmila MulliganDirector | Sold | 1,974 | $119.00 | $234,906 | Form 4 |
| Mar 31, 2026 | Ryan Michael LanceChairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 113,221 | $132.71 | $15.0 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 24, 2026 | Kelly Brunetti RoseSVP & General Counsel | Sold | 7,700 | $130.03 | $1.0 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Nicholas G OldsExecutive Vice President | Sold | 6,994 | $127.06 | $888,658 | Form 4 |
| Mar 20, 2026 | Ryan Michael LanceChairman and CEO, Director | Sold | 506,800 | $127.26 | $64.5 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Andrew D LundquistSenior Vice President | Sold | 34,500 | $119.68 | $4.1 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Heather G. HrapSenior Vice President | Sold | 2,654 | $119.68 | $317,631 | Form 4 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Nicholas G OldsExecutive Vice President | Sold | 14,522 | $119.36 | $1.7 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 12, 2026 | Welsh Kontessa S HaynesVP & Controller | Sold | 10,339 | $120.07 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 11, 2026 | Nicholas G OldsExecutive Vice President | Sold | 12,150 | $116.37 | $1.4 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| F-score | 5 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 5 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −9.5% | −9.9% | −9.7% |
Compare
Put ConocoPhillips side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ConocoPhillips | FY25 | 7.7% | — | — | 10.7% | 0.7x | 5 | |
| EOG Resources | FY25 | −4.5% | 28.2% | — | 16.2% | 0.4x | 4 | Compare |
| Occidental Petroleum | FY25 | −1.9% | — | 19.0% | 4.9% | 1.7x | 4 | Compare |
| Devon Energy | FY25 | 7.8% | — | 18.1% | 13.0% | 1.1x | 5 | Compare |
| Diamondback Energy | FY25 | 35.8% | 8.4% | — | 1.9% | 2.3x | 4 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 24.4 | 32.6 | 38.7 | 36.7 | 18.8 | 45.8 | 78.5 | 56.1 | 54.7 | 58.9 |
| Revenue growth | −21.2% | 33.8% | 18.9% | −5.3% | −48.8% | 144.0% | 71.3% | −28.5% | −2.5% | 7.7% |
| Gross profit | 14.4 | 20.1 | 24.4 | 24.8 | 10.7 | 27.7 | 44.5 | 34.2 | 34.7 | 36.6 |
| Research and development | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Operating income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | −3.6 | −0.9 | 6.3 | 7.2 | −2.7 | 8.1 | 18.7 | 11.0 | 9.2 | 8.0 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −2.91 | −0.70 | 5.32 | 6.40 | −2.51 | 6.07 | 14.57 | 9.06 | 7.81 | 6.35 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 1,245 | 1,221 | 1,176 | 1,124 | 1,078 | 1,328 | 1,278 | 1,206 | 1,181 | 1,253 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 4.4 | 7.1 | 12.9 | 11.1 | 4.8 | 17.0 | 28.3 | 20.0 | 20.1 | 19.8 |
| Capital expenditure | 4.9 | 4.6 | 6.8 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 10.2 | — | — | — |
| Free cash flow | −0.5 | 2.5 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 0.1 | 11.7 | 18.2 | — | — | — |
| Dividends paid | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 4.0 |
| Share buybacks | 0.1 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0.9 | 3.6 | 9.3 | 5.4 | 5.5 | 5.0 |
| Acquisitions | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 0.1 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 3.7 | 8.2 | 6.2 | 8.1 | 6.6 | — | 9.2 | 6.6 | 6.1 | 7.0 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 26.2 | 22.4 | 16.1 | 14.8 | 15.4 | 19.9 | 16.6 | 18.9 | 24.3 | 23.4 |
| Total assets | 89.8 | 73.4 | 70.0 | 70.5 | 62.6 | 90.7 | 93.8 | 95.9 | 122.8 | 121.9 |
| Total liabilities | 54.5 | 42.6 | 37.9 | 35.5 | 32.8 | 45.3 | 45.8 | 46.6 | 58.0 | 57.5 |
| Shareholders' equity | 35.0 | 30.6 | 31.9 | 35.0 | 29.8 | 45.4 | 48.0 | 49.3 | 64.8 | 64.5 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 59.0% | 61.7% | 63.1% | 67.7% | 57.0% | 60.4% | 56.7% | 60.9% | 63.5% | 62.1% |
| Operating margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net margin | −14.8% | −2.6% | 16.2% | 19.6% | −14.4% | 17.6% | 23.8% | 19.5% | 16.9% | 13.6% |
| Free cash flow margin | −1.9% | 7.6% | 16.0% | 12.2% | 0.5% | 25.5% | 23.1% | — | — | — |
| Return on capital | −5.7% | −2.3% | 15.7% | 18.8% | −4.6% | — | — | 19.7% | 13.7% | 10.7% |
| Return on equity | −9.7% | −2.6% | 20.0% | 21.5% | −8.3% | 21.5% | 40.0% | 22.5% | 16.2% | 12.4% |
| Return on assets | −3.9% | −1.1% | 8.7% | 10.2% | −4.1% | 10.5% | 20.2% | 11.6% | 8.4% | 6.5% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 4.7x | 2.7x | 0.6x | 0.4x | 2.8x | — | 0.2x | 0.5x | 0.8x | 0.7x |