CoreCivic
CoreCivic's revenue rose 12.7% to $2.2 billion in fiscal 2025. Its net margin was 5.3%, up from 3.5% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $53 million, down 73.4%. It paid out $229 million in dividends and buybacks, 434% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 3.5%.
Net margin is net income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What CoreCivic does
CoreCivic owns and runs prisons, detention centers and residential reentry centers for government agencies, and leases correctional real estate to them. Its customers are federal, state and local governments. It says it is the nation's largest owner of partnership correctional, detention and residential reentry facilities. Its facilities also offer education, job training and treatment programs, along with health care and food service.
It reports three segments. CoreCivic Safety operated 44 correctional and detention facilities at the end of 2025, with room for about 68,000 beds. CoreCivic Community owned and ran 20 residential reentry centers, with about 4,000 beds, and also provides electronic monitoring. CoreCivic Properties owned five properties with about 8,000 beds that it leases to government agencies.
In Safety and Community, the company is paid a daily rate for each bed used. Contracts typically run one to five years, and most let the government agency end them at any time without cause. They also depend on yearly legislative funding. The company has operated since 1983.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Government contracts that can be ended at any time, are not renewed, or are rebid to competitors.
- Government budget limits, shutdowns and efforts to cut the federal deficit that could reduce payments.
- Competition from other providers, including government agencies that run facilities themselves.
- Its ability to win new contracts depends on many factors outside its control.
- Demand for detention beds may not grow as it expects.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share fell 5.9% a year and net income 6.8% a year, while buybacks cut the share count by 9%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value CoreCivic yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from CoreCivic's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from CoreCivic's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $53M, net cash of −$1.1B at December 31, 2025 and 107 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to CoreCivic: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 6.2% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Diversified Support Services), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $3.0B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2021); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target. A negative value means CoreCivic's net debt is larger than what that scenario's cash flows are worth today.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $29.87
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from CoreCivic's earnings per share of $1.24 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 24.1×, the middle of CoreCivic's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (CoreCivic's own P/E today) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $29.87
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- CoreCivic's P/E at the last close
- 24.1×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| RB GlobalRBA | $84.69 | $2.32 | 36.5× |
| CoreCivicCXW | $29.87 | $1.24 | 24.1× |
| CopartCPRT | $29.15 | $1.55 | 18.8× |
| Science Applications IntlSAIC | $148.51 | $8.56 | 17.3× |
| KBRKBR | $40.02 | $3.33 | 12.0× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 300 | 149 | 122 | 108 | 98 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 1,527 | 1,250 | 1,095 | 985 | 1,221 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 1,228 | 1,101 | 973 | 878 | 1,123 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 4.0x | 2.9x | 3.3x | 3.0x | 3.2x |
| Debt to equity | 1.1x | 0.9x | 0.7x | 0.7x | 0.9x |
| Interest coverage | 2.0x | 3.0x | 2.3x | 2.4x | 3.5x |
| Current ratio | 1.8x | 1.1x | 1.6x | 1.6x | 1.7x |
| Quick ratio | 1.8x | 1.1x | 1.6x | 1.6x | 1.7x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought CoreCivic shares on the open market, and 10 insiders sold $17.6 million, $2.1 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2026 | Daren SwensonEVP, Chief Corr & Reentry Ofcr | Sold | 20,000 | $34.85 | $697,000 | Form 4 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Cole G. CarterChief Administrative Officer | Sold plan | 12,500 | $32.44 | $405,500 | Form 4 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Anthony L GrandeEVP, Chief Development Officer | Sold | 12,564 | $33.85 | $425,291 | Form 4 |
| Aug 26, 2026 | John R Prann JrDirector | Sold | 3,098 | $34.00 | $105,332 | Form 4 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Mark A EmkesDirector | Sold | 30,000 | $34.25 | $1.0 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Anthony L GrandeEVP, Chief Development Officer | Sold | 7,436 | $34.25 | $254,683 | Form 4 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | David GarfinkleEVP & Chief Financial Officer | Sold | 50,000 | $33.96 | $1.7 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | John R Prann JrDirector | Sold | 22,298 | $34.00 | $758,132 | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | David GarfinkleEVP & Chief Financial Officer | Sold | 50,000 | $33.76 | $1.7 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | John R Prann JrDirector | Sold | 40,000 | $33.54 | $1.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Anthony L GrandeEVP, Chief Development Officer | Sold | 29,199 | $33.61 | $981,378 | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | John R Prann JrDirector | Sold | 30,000 | $32.21 | $966,300 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 7 of 8 | 7 of 8 | 7 of 8 |
| Accruals ratio | −5.2% | −6.6% | −2.5% |
Compare
Put CoreCivic side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoreCivic | FY25 | 12.7% | — | 2.4% | 6.6% | 3.2x | 7 | |
| RB Global | FY25 | 7.2% | 15.5% | 15.7% | 7.6% | 1.7x | 6 | Compare |
| Copart | FY26 | 0.4% | 35.4% | 27.2% | 19.6% | −1.0x | 4 | Compare |
| Science Applications Intl | FY26 | −2.9% | 7.2% | 8.0% | 12.8% | 4.2x | 7 | Compare |
| KBR | FY25 | 1.0% | 10.0% | 6.6% | 15.8% | 2.2x | 7 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 1,850 | 1,766 | 1,836 | 1,981 | 1,906 | 1,863 | 1,845 | 1,897 | 1,962 | 2,211 |
| Revenue growth | 5.4% | −4.6% | 4.0% | 7.9% | −3.8% | −2.2% | −0.9% | 2.8% | 3.4% | 12.7% |
| Gross profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | 296 | 260 | 250 | 282 | 163 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | 220 | 178 | 159 | 189 | 54 | −52 | 122 | 68 | 69 | 116 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 1.87 | 1.50 | 1.34 | 1.59 | 0.45 | −0.43 | 1.03 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 1.08 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 118 | 118 | 119 | 119 | 121 | 120 | 118 | 114 | 111 | 107 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 375 | 341 | 323 | 354 | 356 | 263 | 154 | 232 | 269 | 195 |
| Capital expenditure | 134 | 115 | 487 | 191 | 160 | 82 | 83 | 68 | 70 | 142 |
| Free cash flow | 241 | 227 | −164 | 164 | 196 | 182 | 70 | 164 | 199 | 53 |
| Dividends paid | 256 | 200 | 204 | 210 | 106 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 80 | 43 | 77 | 229 |
| Acquisitions | 44 | 49 | 176 | 48 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 74 |
| Stock-based compensation | 18 | 13 | 13 | 17 | 17 | 19 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 28 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 38 | 52 | 53 | 92 | 113 | 300 | 149 | 122 | 108 | 98 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 1,445 | 1,447 | 1,802 | 1,959 | 1,787 | 1,527 | 1,250 | 1,095 | 985 | 1,221 |
| Total assets | 3,272 | 3,272 | 3,656 | 3,792 | 3,709 | 3,499 | 3,245 | 3,105 | 2,932 | 3,257 |
| Total liabilities | 1,813 | 1,821 | 2,241 | 2,415 | 2,296 | 2,126 | 1,812 | 1,628 | 1,438 | 1,852 |
| Shareholders' equity | 1,459 | 1,452 | 1,415 | 1,377 | 1,390 | 1,372 | 1,432 | 1,478 | 1,493 | 1,405 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | 16.0% | 14.8% | 13.6% | 14.2% | 8.5% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net margin | 11.9% | 10.1% | 8.7% | 9.5% | 2.8% | −2.8% | 6.6% | 3.6% | 3.5% | 5.3% |
| Free cash flow margin | 13.0% | 12.8% | −8.9% | 8.3% | 10.3% | 9.8% | 3.8% | 8.7% | 10.1% | 2.4% |
| Return on capital | 10.0% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 8.4% | 4.8% | 3.0% | 7.2% | 4.8% | 5.0% | 6.6% |
| Return on equity | 15.1% | 12.2% | 11.1% | 13.5% | 3.9% | −3.8% | 8.7% | 4.7% | 4.6% | 8.0% |
| Return on assets | 6.6% | 5.4% | 4.6% | 5.1% | 1.4% | −1.4% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 2.3% | 3.8% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 3.0x | 3.4x | 4.3x | 4.4x | 5.3x | 4.0x | 2.9x | 3.3x | 3.0x | 3.2x |