Innospec
Innospec's revenue fell 3.6% to $1.8 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 7.3%, down from 9.6% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $88 million, down 38.5%. It paid out $66 million in dividends and buybacks, 75% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 0.5%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 3.8% a year and net income 4.1% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 2% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Innospec yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Innospec's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Innospec's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $88M, net cash of $292M at December 31, 2025 and 25 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Innospec: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -3.3% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 13%: 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Specialty Chemicals), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $2.4B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (revenue fell in two of the last five years); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $99.18
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Innospec's earnings per share of $4.90 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 20.5×, the middle of Innospec's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (the Materials median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 14%, 13% and 12%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $99.18
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Innospec's P/E at the last close
- 20.2×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sensient TechnologiesSXT | $131.45 | $3.71 | 35.4× |
| Quaker ChemicalKWR | $154.87 | $5.61 | 27.6× |
| InnospecIOSP | $99.18 | $4.90 | 20.2× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 142 | 147 | 204 | 289 | 292 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −142 | −147 | −204 | −289 | −292 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −0.8x | −0.7x | −1.0x | −1.3x | −1.7x |
| Debt to equity | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x | 0.0x |
| Interest coverage | — | — | — | — | — |
| Current ratio | 2.2x | 2.1x | 2.4x | 2.6x | 2.8x |
| Quick ratio | 1.3x | 1.2x | 1.6x | 1.8x | 1.9x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $25,191 of Innospec shares on the open market, and 5 insiders sold $398,854.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2026 | David B. JonesSVP, GC & CCO | Sold | 1,028 | $75.64 | $77,758 | Form 4 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Ian CleminsonEVP & CFO | Sold | 2,380 | $76.56 | $182,213 | Form 4 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | David LandlessDirector | Sold | 594 | $76.56 | $45,477 | Form 4 |
| Feb 27, 2026 | Claudia PocciaDirector | Sold | 119 | $76.56 | $9,111 | Form 4 |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Larry PADFIELDDirector | Sold | 1,030 | $81.84 | $84,295 | Form 4 |
| Nov 14, 2025 | Leslie J ParretteDirector | Bought | 340 | $74.09 | $25,191 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| F-score | 6 of 9 | 4 of 9 | 6 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −4.1% | −8.7% | −1.2% |
Compare
Put Innospec side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innospec | FY25 | −3.6% | 7.3% | 5.0% | 11.1% | −1.7x | 6 | |
| Quaker Chemical | FY25 | 2.7% | 2.8% | 4.3% | 1.3% | 6.1x | 5 | Compare |
| Sensient Technologies | FY25 | 3.5% | 12.8% | 2.4% | 8.9% | 2.5x | 6 | Compare |
| Minerals Technologies | FY25 | −2.2% | 2.3% | 4.2% | 1.6% | — | 4 | Compare |
| Stepan | FY25 | 7.0% | 3.4% | 1.1% | 3.6% | 2.4x | 6 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 883 | 1,307 | 1,477 | 1,513 | 1,193 | 1,483 | 1,964 | 1,949 | 1,845 | 1,778 |
| Revenue growth | −12.7% | 47.9% | 13.0% | 2.5% | −21.2% | 24.3% | 32.4% | −0.8% | −5.3% | −3.6% |
| Gross profit | 332 | 403 | 435 | 466 | 343 | 435 | 587 | 591 | 543 | 492 |
| Research and development | 25 | 31 | 33 | 35 | 31 | 37 | 39 | 49 | 56 | 51 |
| Operating income | 98 | 125 | 134 | 150 | 34 | 132 | 187 | 162 | 178 | 130 |
| Net income | 81 | 62 | 85 | 112 | 29 | 93 | 133 | 139 | 36 | 117 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 3.33 | 2.52 | 3.45 | 4.54 | 1.16 | 3.75 | 5.32 | 5.56 | 1.42 | 4.67 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 24 | 24 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 106 | 83 | 105 | 162 | 146 | 93 | 82 | 207 | 184 | 138 |
| Capital expenditure | 16 | 23 | 29 | 30 | 30 | 39 | 40 | 62 | 41 | 50 |
| Free cash flow | 89 | 59 | 76 | 132 | 116 | 54 | 42 | 145 | 143 | 88 |
| Dividends paid | 16 | 19 | 22 | 25 | 26 | 29 | 32 | 35 | 39 | 42 |
| Share buybacks | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 24 |
| Acquisitions | 197 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 0 | 1 |
| Stock-based compensation | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 102 | 90 | 123 | 76 | 105 | 142 | 147 | 204 | 289 | 292 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 269 | 218 | 208 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total assets | 1,181 | 1,410 | 1,473 | 1,469 | 1,397 | 1,571 | 1,604 | 1,707 | 1,735 | 1,832 |
| Total liabilities | 528 | 616 | 648 | 550 | 452 | 538 | 563 | 558 | 519 | 500 |
| Shareholders' equity | 654 | 794 | 825 | 918 | 944 | 1,032 | 1,038 | 1,147 | 1,211 | 1,326 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 37.6% | 30.9% | 29.4% | 30.8% | 28.7% | 29.3% | 29.9% | 30.3% | 29.4% | 27.7% |
| Operating margin | 11.1% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 9.9% | 2.8% | 8.9% | 9.5% | 8.3% | 9.6% | 7.3% |
| Net margin | 9.2% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 7.4% | 2.4% | 6.3% | 6.8% | 7.1% | 1.9% | 6.6% |
| Free cash flow margin | 10.1% | 4.5% | 5.2% | 8.7% | 9.7% | 3.6% | 2.1% | 7.5% | 7.8% | 5.0% |
| Return on capital | 10.9% | 7.2% | 9.4% | 12.3% | 2.8% | 10.6% | 15.1% | 14.0% | 16.4% | 11.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.9% | 8.5% | 10.5% | 12.9% | 3.1% | 9.4% | 12.8% | 12.7% | 3.0% | 9.2% |
| Return on assets | 7.4% | 4.8% | 5.9% | 7.6% | 2.0% | 6.3% | 8.4% | 8.4% | 2.1% | 6.5% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 1.2x | 0.7x | 0.5x | −0.1x | −1.3x | −0.8x | −0.7x | −1.0x | −1.3x | −1.7x |