SharkNinja
SharkNinja's revenue rose 15.8% to $6.4 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 14.4%, up from 11.7% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $488 million, up 58.0%. The diluted share count rose 0.7%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What SharkNinja does
SharkNinja designs small household appliances sold under two brands. Shark is best known for vacuums and floor care, and Ninja for kitchen appliances. Its products include vacuums, carpet cleaners, fans, air purifiers, beauty products, blenders, frozen drink makers, espresso machines and outdoor cooking products. It sells through most major retailers and distributors, and also directly to shoppers through its websites and infomercials, in 38 markets.
Net sales grew by $870.5 million, or 15.7%, in 2025. Cleaning appliances brought in $2,205.8 million, cooking and beverage appliances $1,816.3 million, food preparation appliances $1,550.7 million, and beauty and home environment products $826.3 million. The US made up 62.5% of sales. The company reports one segment. Shark competes with Dyson, Hoover and Bissell; Ninja with Vitamix, De'Longhi, Breville, Hamilton Beach, Cuisinart and others. SharkNinja says most of its rivals sell at lower prices, with exceptions such as Dyson and Vitamix.
SharkNinja doesn't make its own products. Outside suppliers, mostly in China, manufacture them, while its own engineers and designers in the US, the UK and China develop them. It had about 4,143 employees in about 13 countries at the end of 2025.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Failing to keep its brands strong and keep up demand for its products.
- Failing to keep launching new products that people want to buy.
- Its reliance on outside suppliers, many of them in China, and on getting products shipped on time.
- Tariffs and trade policy changes that make products made abroad harder or costlier to get.
- Its reliance on large retailers and distributors to sell its products.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2021 to 2025, earnings per share grew 20.0% a year and net income 20.6% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 2% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value SharkNinja yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from SharkNinja's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from SharkNinja's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $488M, net cash of $41M at December 31, 2025 and 142 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to SharkNinja: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 19.8% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 9% for a business of moderate risk (Household Appliances); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $198.63
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from SharkNinja's earnings per share of $4.94 (in fiscal 2025). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 17.7×, the middle of SharkNinja's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (the Consumer Discretionary median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 10%, 9% and 8%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $198.63
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- SharkNinja's P/E at the last close
- 40.2×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| SharkNinjaSN | $198.63 | $4.94 | 40.2× |
| Victoria's SecretVSXY | $94.96 | $4.49 | 21.1× |
| Levi StraussLEVI | $21.84 | $1.50 | 14.6× |
| WhirlpoolWHR | $26.45 | $2.93 | 9.0× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 225 | 193 | 154 | 364 | 777 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | — | 436 | 800 | 776 | 736 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | — | 243 | 646 | 412 | −41 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | 0.6x | 1.4x | 0.5x | −0.0x |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.2x | 0.5x | 0.4x | 0.3x |
| Interest coverage | 36.5x | 19.7x | 7.3x | 10.0x | 18.2x |
| Current ratio | — | 1.8x | 1.7x | 1.7x | 2.0x |
| Quick ratio | — | 1.2x | 1.1x | 1.1x | 1.5x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought SharkNinja shares on the open market, and 6 insiders sold $600.2 million, $158.8 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2026 | Neil B. ShahChief Commercial Officer | Sold | 50,000 | $186.36 | $9.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Peter FeldDirector | Sold | 5,000 | $180.00 | $900,000 | Form 4 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | Neil B. ShahChief Commercial Officer | Sold | 20,333 | $184.69 | $3.8 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Neil B. ShahChief Commercial Officer | Sold | 29,667 | $186.76 | $5.5 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Adam QuigleyChief Financial Officer | Sold | 1,750 | $183.94 | $321,895 | Form 4 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | Mark BarrocasChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 250,000 | $185.00 | $46.2 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | Mark BarrocasChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 250,000 | $170.00 | $42.5 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 17, 2026 | Mark BarrocasChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 250,000 | $155.01 | $38.8 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 10, 2026 | Xuning WangDirector, 10% owner | Sold | 2,668,200 | $150.36 | $401.2 million | Form 4 |
| Jun 25, 2026 | Mark BarrocasChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 100,000 | $145.00 | $14.5 million | Form 4 |
| Jun 18, 2026 | Mark BarrocasChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 100,000 | $140.00 | $14.0 million | Form 4 |
| Jun 4, 2026 | Pedro J. Lopez-BaldrichChief Legal Officer | Sold | 2,200 | $122.60 | $269,720 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | — | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Debt fell relative to assets | — | Pass | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | — | Pass | Fail |
| F-score | — | 8 of 9 | 6 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −3.4% | −0.2% | 1.4% |
Compare
Put SharkNinja side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SharkNinja | FY25 | 15.8% | 14.4% | 7.6% | 28.8% | −0.0x | 6 | |
| Whirlpool | FY25 | −6.5% | 5.4% | 0.5% | 7.2% | 5.0x | 5 | Compare |
| Camping World | FY25 | 4.4% | 2.8% | — | 4.9% | 5.0x | — | Compare |
| Levi Strauss | FY25 | 4.1% | 10.8% | 4.9% | 22.2% | 0.3x | 7 | Compare |
| Victoria's Secret | FY25 | 5.2% | 4.1% | 4.8% | 17.7% | 0.9x | 6 | Compare |
5 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | |||||
| Revenue | 3,727 | 3,717 | 4,254 | 5,529 | 6,399 |
| Revenue growth | — | −0.3% | 14.4% | 30.0% | 15.8% |
| Gross profit | 1,438 | 1,410 | 1,908 | 2,662 | 3,136 |
| Research and development | 201 | 216 | 249 | 341 | 368 |
| Operating income | 438 | 321 | 374 | 644 | 920 |
| Net income | 331 | 232 | 167 | 439 | 701 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 2.38 | 1.67 | 1.20 | 3.11 | 4.94 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 139 | 139 | 139 | 141 | 142 |
| Cash flow | |||||
| Cash from operations | 229 | 205 | 281 | 447 | 634 |
| Capital expenditure | 48 | 80 | 123 | 138 | 146 |
| Free cash flow | 181 | 125 | 158 | 309 | 488 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 150 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 14 | 6 | 47 | 84 | 44 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | |||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 225 | 193 | 154 | 364 | 777 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | — | 436 | 800 | 776 | 736 |
| Total assets | — | 3,295 | 3,487 | 4,394 | 5,349 |
| Total liabilities | — | 1,467 | 2,008 | 2,458 | 2,673 |
| Shareholders' equity | 1,761 | 1,828 | 1,479 | 1,936 | 2,676 |
| Margins and ratios | |||||
| Gross margin | 38.6% | 37.9% | 44.9% | 48.1% | 49.0% |
| Operating margin | 11.8% | 8.7% | 8.8% | 11.7% | 14.4% |
| Net margin | 8.9% | 6.2% | 3.9% | 7.9% | 11.0% |
| Free cash flow margin | 4.9% | 3.4% | 3.7% | 5.6% | 7.6% |
| Return on capital | — | — | 10.2% | 22.1% | 28.8% |
| Return on equity | — | — | 10.1% | 25.7% | 30.4% |
| Return on assets | — | — | 4.9% | 11.1% | 14.4% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | 0.6x | 1.4x | 0.5x | −0.0x |