The Filing Desk

Hut 8 vs TeraWulf

Hut 8 HUT · TeraWulf WULF · Internet Services & Infrastructure

Hut 8 reported revenue of $235 million in fiscal 2025, 1.4 times TeraWulf's $168 million in fiscal 2025. Hut 8's revenue grew 44.8% in its latest year, and TeraWulf's grew 20.3%. Hut 8 had an operating margin of -136.9%, against -110.5% at TeraWulf.

Side by side

Hut 8TeraWulf
Latest fiscal yearFY2025, Dec 31, 2025FY2025, Dec 31, 2025
Revenue$235M$168M
Revenue growth44.8%20.3%
Revenue growth a year, last 5 years——
Gross margin54.2%39.2%
Operating margin−136.9%−110.5%
Net margin−96.2%−392.6%
Free cash flow—−$1.2B
Free cash flow margin—−702.5%
Return on capital——
Net debt to EBITDA——
Dividends and buybacks$0M$33M
Change in diluted share count4.2%13.2%
Last close$52.65$11.37
P/E at the last close——
Insider trades, last 12 monthssold $15.2 millionbought $440,531, sold $36.1 million
Piotroski F-score—1 of 9
Amounts in each company's own currency, US$ unless marked (a foreign company may report in another), each company's latest fiscal year from its 10-K, or 20-F or 40-F for a foreign company. Growth rates compare with the year before; the five-year rate is the average a year. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending; return on capital is after-tax operating income over the money invested in the business; P/E is the last close over the latest earnings per share. Banks are measured differently (return on equity, efficiency ratio), so some rows apply to one company only.

Ten years

Revenue
US$ billions, fiscal years
Hut 8TeraWulf
Operating margin
Percent of revenue
Hut 8TeraWulf
Free cash flow
US$ billions. Cash from operations minus capital expenditure.
Hut 8TeraWulf

Start a new comparison

Source: the companies' Form 10-K filings, from SEC EDGAR, and the last close. For information only, not investment advice: the figures describe results, not which company is the better investment. The Filing Desk is not affiliated with either company. Full figures on the Hut 8 and TeraWulf pages.