Bruker
Bruker's revenue rose 2.1% to $3.4 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 2.0%, down from 7.5% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $43 million, down 68.2%. It paid out $33 million in dividends and buybacks, 76% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 1.5%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2024, earnings per share fell 2.8% a year and net income 3.8% a year, while buybacks cut the share count by 8%. Bruker then lost money in fiscal 2025.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Bruker yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Bruker's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Bruker's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $43M, net cash of −$1.6B at December 31, 2025 and 152 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Bruker: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 10.7% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Health Care Equipment), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $8.9B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2025); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target. A negative value means Bruker's net debt is larger than what that scenario's cash flows are worth today.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $58.23
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
The P/E method needs positive earnings, and Bruker's latest diluted earnings per share were negative or zero.
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 1,168 | 646 | 488 | 183 | 299 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 1,338 | 1,233 | 1,302 | 2,112 | 1,888 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 170 | 588 | 814 | 1,928 | 1,589 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.3x | 1.1x | 1.5x | 4.4x | 5.5x |
| Debt to equity | 1.2x | 1.1x | 0.9x | 1.2x | 0.8x |
| Interest coverage | 28.9x | 26.9x | 26.6x | 5.3x | 1.1x |
| Current ratio | 2.6x | 2.3x | 1.8x | 1.6x | 1.7x |
| Quick ratio | 1.9x | 1.4x | 1.0x | 0.8x | 0.9x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Bruker shares on the open market, and 4 insiders sold $3.6 million, $2.9 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $52.87 | $105,740 | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Wolfgang PuschPresident BMID Group | Sold | 3,473 | $56.90 | $197,614 | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $57.60 | $115,200 | Form 4 |
| Jul 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $60.25 | $120,500 | Form 4 |
| Jun 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $54.76 | $109,520 | Form 4 |
| May 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $43.90 | $87,800 | Form 4 |
| Apr 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $39.90 | $79,800 | Form 4 |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $35.44 | $70,880 | Form 4 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $36.94 | $73,880 | Form 4 |
| Jan 15, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 2,000 | $49.20 | $98,400 | Form 4 |
| Jan 12, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 7,000 | $55.00 | $385,000 | Form 4 |
| Jan 5, 2026 | Mark MunchExec Vp&pres Bruker Nano Inc. | Sold plan | 33,843 | $49.66 | $1.7 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| F-score | 6 of 9 | 3 of 9 | 4 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | 2.0% | −2.8% | −2.4% |
Compare
Put Bruker side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruker | FY25 | 2.1% | 2.0% | 1.3% | 0.9% | 5.5x | 4 | |
| AdaptHealth | FY25 | −0.5% | 2.8% | 6.8% | 2.1% | 3.5x | 4 | Compare |
| Globus Medical | FY25 | 16.6% | 16.3% | 20.0% | 11.0% | −0.7x | 9 | Compare |
| Revvity | FY25 | 3.7% | 12.5% | 17.8% | 3.3% | 3.0x | 5 | Compare |
| Idexx Laboratories | FY25 | 10.4% | 31.6% | 24.6% | 57.3% | 0.2x | 8 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 1,611 | 1,766 | 1,896 | 2,073 | 1,988 | 2,418 | 2,531 | 2,964 | 3,366 | 3,436 |
| Revenue growth | −0.8% | 9.6% | 7.3% | 9.3% | −4.1% | 21.7% | 4.7% | 17.1% | 13.6% | 2.1% |
| Gross profit | 745 | 816 | 900 | 995 | 940 | 1,210 | 1,306 | 1,513 | 1,650 | 1,578 |
| Research and development | 148 | 162 | 173 | 188 | 198 | 221 | 236 | 295 | 376 | 395 |
| Operating income | 182 | 220 | 262 | 301 | 248 | 413 | 433 | 437 | 253 | 68 |
| Net income | 154 | 79 | 180 | 197 | 158 | 277 | 297 | 427 | 113 | −9 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 0.95 | 0.49 | 1.14 | 1.26 | 1.02 | 1.81 | 1.99 | 2.90 | 0.76 | −0.15 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 162 | 159 | 157 | 157 | 155 | 153 | 149 | 147 | 150 | 152 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 131 | 154 | 240 | 213 | 332 | 282 | 274 | 350 | 251 | 134 |
| Capital expenditure | 37 | 44 | 49 | 73 | 97 | 92 | 129 | 107 | 115 | 91 |
| Free cash flow | 94 | 111 | 190 | 140 | 235 | 190 | 145 | 243 | 136 | 43 |
| Dividends paid | 26 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 24 | 30 | 29 | 30 | 23 |
| Share buybacks | 160 | 152 | 0 | 142 | 123 | 153 | 263 | 152 | 0 | 10 |
| Acquisitions | 24 | 66 | 192 | 90 | 59 | 65 | 182 | 227 | 1,600 | 74 |
| Stock-based compensation | 9 | 11 | 11 | 10 | 16 | 17 | 28 | 31 | 25 | 20 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 342 | 439 | 322 | 685 | 732 | 1,168 | 646 | 488 | 183 | 299 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 412 | 416 | 341 | 815 | 848 | 1,338 | 1,233 | 1,302 | 2,112 | 1,888 |
| Total assets | 1,808 | 1,948 | 2,129 | 2,772 | 3,049 | 3,650 | 3,612 | 4,250 | 5,807 | 6,241 |
| Total liabilities | 1,115 | 1,215 | 1,224 | 1,854 | 2,075 | 2,565 | 2,480 | 2,837 | 3,992 | 3,731 |
| Shareholders' equity | 686 | 725 | 897 | 907 | 961 | 1,070 | 1,114 | 1,377 | 1,781 | 2,456 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 46.2% | 46.2% | 47.5% | 48.0% | 47.3% | 50.0% | 51.6% | 51.0% | 49.0% | 45.9% |
| Operating margin | 11.3% | 12.4% | 13.8% | 14.5% | 12.5% | 17.1% | 17.1% | 14.7% | 7.5% | 2.0% |
| Net margin | 9.5% | 4.5% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 7.9% | 11.5% | 11.7% | 14.4% | 3.4% | −0.2% |
| Free cash flow margin | 5.8% | 6.3% | 10.1% | 6.8% | 11.8% | 7.9% | 5.7% | 8.2% | 4.0% | 1.3% |
| Return on capital | 21.2% | 14.9% | 23.8% | 21.6% | 16.6% | 25.1% | 20.9% | 17.5% | 4.8% | 0.9% |
| Return on equity | 21.8% | 11.1% | 22.2% | 21.9% | 16.9% | 27.3% | 27.2% | 34.3% | 7.2% | −0.4% |
| Return on assets | 8.7% | 4.2% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 5.4% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 10.9% | 2.2% | −0.1% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.3x | −0.1x | 0.1x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 0.3x | 1.1x | 1.5x | 4.4x | 5.5x |