Crocs
Crocs' revenue fell 1.5% to $4.0 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 3.7%, down from 24.9% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $659 million, down 28.6%. It paid out $582 million in dividends and buybacks, 88% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 9.4%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What Crocs does
Crocs designs and sells casual shoes under two brands. The Crocs brand is best known for its molded clogs, made mostly from its own Croslite material, along with sandals and Jibbitz charms that clip onto the shoes. HEYDUDE sells light, slip-on loafers, mainly the Wally and Wendy, plus sneakers, boots, sandals and some clothing. It sells worldwide to retailers and online sellers, through distributors, and directly to shoppers in its own stores and on its websites.
The Crocs Brand and HEYDUDE Brand are its two segments. Revenues fell 1.5% in 2025, as HEYDUDE sales dropped 13.3% while Crocs Brand sales rose. Sales to retailers and other wholesale customers made up 47.9% of revenue, and digital sales 37.8%. Sales outside the US were 48.6% of Crocs Brand revenue, while HEYDUDE sells mostly in North America. It names Nike, adidas, Deckers, Birkenstock, Steven Madden, Wolverine World Wide and VF among the companies it competes with in parts of its business.
Crocs does not make its own shoes. Outside manufacturers make them, mostly in Asia, with Vietnam the largest source for both brands. At the end of 2025 it had more than 8,010 employees, about 4,940 of them in its stores.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Failing to protect the value and appeal of its brands, which its business depends on.
- Its full reliance on outside factories abroad, mainly in Asia, to make its shoes.
- Tariffs, inflation and weak economies that cut consumer spending or raise its costs.
- Its future growth may depend partly on HEYDUDE, whose sales fell in 2025.
- Misjudging demand, leaving it with too much stock or too little to fill orders.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2019 to 2024, earnings per share grew 57.1% a year and net income 51.4% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 17%. Crocs then lost money in fiscal 2025.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Crocs yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Crocs' 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Crocs' fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $659M, net cash of −$1.1B at December 31, 2025 and 54 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Crocs: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 4.4% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Footwear), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $5.9B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2025); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $118.85
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Crocs' earnings per share of $11.42 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 15.7×, the middle of Crocs' own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $118.85
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Crocs' P/E at the last close
- 10.4×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steven MaddenSHOO | $42.76 | $2.00 | 21.4× |
| Wolverine World WideWWW | $20.28 | $1.29 | 15.7× |
| Deckers BrandsDECK | $80.37 | $7.07 | 11.4× |
| CrocsCROX | $118.85 | $11.42 | 10.4× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 213 | 192 | 149 | 180 | 130 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 771 | 2,322 | 1,664 | 1,349 | 1,231 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 558 | 2,131 | 1,515 | 1,169 | 1,100 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.8x | 2.4x | 1.4x | 1.1x | 4.8x |
| Debt to equity | — | 2.8x | 1.1x | 0.7x | 0.9x |
| Interest coverage | 31.6x | 6.2x | 6.4x | 9.3x | 1.7x |
| Current ratio | 1.7x | 1.6x | 1.3x | 1.2x | 1.3x |
| Quick ratio | 1.2x | 0.9x | 0.8x | 0.7x | 0.7x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 3 insiders bought $836,069 of Crocs shares on the open market, and 3 insiders sold $10.2 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2026 | Beth J KaplanDirector | Bought | 885 | $112.12 | $99,226 | Form 4 |
| Sep 15, 2026 | Thomas J SmachDirector | Bought | 680 | $111.49 | $75,813 | Form 4 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | Thomas J SmachDirector | Bought | 4,000 | $109.38 | $437,530 | Form 4 |
| Aug 10, 2026 | Andrew ReesChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 19,072 | $138.91 | $2.6 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Andrew ReesChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 10,928 | $137.76 | $1.5 million | Form 4 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | Andrew ReesChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold | 32,688 | $118.09 | $3.9 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Anne MehlmanEVP & Crocs Brand President | Sold | 12,145 | $100.06 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Feb 20, 2026 | Thomas J SmachDirector | Sold | 4,963 | $100.00 | $496,300 | Form 4 |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Thomas J SmachDirector | Sold | 5,000 | $98.41 | $492,050 | Form 4 |
| Nov 11, 2025 | John B ReplogleDirector | Bought | 3,000 | $74.50 | $223,500 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| F-score | 6 of 9 | 8 of 9 | 5 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −3.0% | −0.9% | −17.6% |
Compare
Put Crocs side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crocs | FY25 | −1.5% | 3.7% | 16.3% | 2.8% | 4.8x | 5 | |
| Deckers Brands | FY26 | 9.8% | 23.1% | 20.1% | 160.3% | −1.4x | 4 | Compare |
| Steven Madden | FY25 | 11.0% | 3.2% | 4.7% | 6.0% | 1.1x | 6 | Compare |
| Birkenstock | FY25 | 16.2% | 26.2% | 14.7% | 11.6% | 1.2x | 9 | Compare |
| Wolverine World Wide | FY25 | 6.8% | 8.0% | 6.7% | 15.1% | 2.4x | 7 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 1,036 | 1,024 | 1,088 | 1,231 | 1,386 | 2,313 | 3,555 | 3,962 | 4,102 | 4,041 |
| Revenue growth | −5.0% | −1.2% | 6.3% | 13.1% | 12.6% | 66.9% | 53.7% | 11.5% | 3.5% | −1.5% |
| Gross profit | 500 | 517 | 560 | 617 | 750 | 1,420 | 1,860 | 2,210 | 2,410 | 2,357 |
| Research and development | 12 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 21 | 26 | 30 |
| Operating income | −6 | 17 | 63 | 129 | 214 | 683 | 851 | 1,037 | 1,022 | 150 |
| Net income | −16 | 10 | 50 | 120 | 313 | 726 | 540 | 793 | 950 | −81 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −0.43 | −0.07 | −1.01 | 1.66 | 4.56 | 11.39 | 8.71 | 12.79 | 15.88 | −1.50 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 73 | 72 | 68 | 72 | 68 | 64 | 62 | 62 | 60 | 54 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 40 | 98 | 114 | 90 | 267 | 567 | 603 | 930 | 992 | 710 |
| Capital expenditure | 22 | 13 | 12 | 37 | 42 | 56 | 104 | 116 | 69 | 51 |
| Free cash flow | 18 | 85 | 102 | 53 | 225 | 511 | 499 | 815 | 923 | 659 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 50 | 63 | 147 | 171 | 1,000 | 0 | 175 | 552 | 582 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,047 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 11 | 10 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 38 | 31 | 29 | 33 | 37 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 148 | 172 | 123 | 108 | 136 | 213 | 192 | 149 | 180 | 130 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 2 | 1 | 120 | 205 | 180 | 771 | 2,322 | 1,664 | 1,349 | 1,231 |
| Total assets | 566 | 544 | 469 | 739 | 1,119 | 1,545 | 4,502 | 4,644 | 4,812 | 4,175 |
| Total liabilities | 167 | 175 | 319 | 607 | 828 | 1,531 | 3,684 | 3,190 | 2,976 | 2,882 |
| Shareholders' equity | 220 | 186 | 150 | 132 | 291 | 14 | 818 | 1,454 | 1,836 | 1,293 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 48.3% | 50.5% | 51.5% | 50.1% | 54.1% | 61.4% | 52.3% | 55.8% | 58.8% | 58.3% |
| Operating margin | −0.6% | 1.7% | 5.8% | 10.4% | 15.4% | 29.5% | 23.9% | 26.2% | 24.9% | 3.7% |
| Net margin | −1.6% | 1.0% | 4.6% | 9.7% | 22.6% | 31.4% | 15.2% | 20.0% | 23.2% | −2.0% |
| Free cash flow margin | 1.7% | 8.3% | 9.4% | 4.3% | 16.2% | 22.1% | 14.0% | 20.6% | 22.5% | 16.3% |
| Return on capital | −5.3% | — | 60.4% | 68.5% | 76.0% | 150.6% | 36.3% | 31.7% | 34.2% | 2.8% |
| Return on equity | −7.1% | 5.0% | 30.0% | 84.7% | 148.1% | 476.3% | 129.8% | 69.8% | 57.8% | −5.2% |
| Return on assets | −2.8% | 1.8% | 10.0% | 19.8% | 33.7% | 54.5% | 17.9% | 17.3% | 20.1% | −1.8% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −5.2x | −3.4x | −0.0x | 0.6x | 0.2x | 0.8x | 2.4x | 1.4x | 1.1x | 4.8x |