Interactive Brokers
Interactive Brokers' revenue rose 19.7% to $6.2 billion in fiscal 2025. Its net margin was 15.9%, up from 14.6% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $15.7 billion, up 81.5%. It paid out $134 million in dividends and buybacks, 1% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 1.8%.
Net margin is net income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on equity is net income as a share of shareholders' equity. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What Interactive Brokers does
Interactive Brokers is an automated global broker. It holds and services accounts for hedge funds, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, registered investment advisors, proprietary trading groups, introducing brokers and individual investors. Customers trade stocks, options, futures, currencies, bonds, mutual funds, precious metals and forecast contracts on electronic exchanges around the world, and can trade some cryptocurrencies through outside providers.
The company earns money from its brokerage and market making activities, and its revenue depends on trading volume and on interest rate levels. It built its own software to automate broker-dealer work, and says this makes it one of the lowest cost providers of broker services. Its roots are in a market making business that its chairman, Thomas Peterffy, started on the American Stock Exchange in 1977.
Its main offices are in Greenwich, Connecticut and Chicago, with offices in Canada, Europe, Dubai, India, China, Japan, Singapore and Australia. It had 3,182 employees at the end of 2025. The listed company, IBG, Inc., is a holding company that owns a minority share of IBG LLC, which runs the businesses.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Revenue and profit that swing with trading volume and interest rates and are hard to predict.
- Losses from its market making activities, including from failures of its pricing model.
- Losses from clearing and execution, or from counterparties that fail to pay.
- Intense competition in direct market access and brokerage.
- Systemic market events and risks from running offices in many countries.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 24.5% a year and net income 31.4% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 65% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Interactive Brokers yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Interactive Brokers' 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Interactive Brokers' fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $15.7B, net cash of $4.9B at December 31, 2025 and 444 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Interactive Brokers: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 26.5% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11% for a cyclical or higher-risk business (Investment Banking & Brokerage); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $80.59
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Interactive Brokers' earnings per share of $2.51 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 21.6×, the middle of Interactive Brokers' own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $80.59
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Interactive Brokers' P/E at the last close
- 32.1×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| RobinhoodHOOD | $92.84 | $2.27 | 40.9× |
| Interactive BrokersIBKR | $80.59 | $2.51 | 32.1× |
| BGC GroupBGC | $11.79 | $0.41 | 28.8× |
| EvercoreEVR | $257.40 | $17.72 | 14.5× |
| Virtu FinancialVIRT | $55.90 | $6.02 | 9.3× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 2,395 | 3,436 | 3,753 | 3,633 | 4,963 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 27 | 18 | 17 | 14 | 19 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −2,368 | −3,418 | −3,736 | −3,619 | −4,944 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −1.1x | −1.1x | −0.6x | −0.5x | −0.6x |
| Debt to equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest coverage | 9.0x | 3.0x | 1.9x | 1.9x | 2.1x |
| Current ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
| Quick ratio | — | — | — | — | — |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $20,119 of Interactive Brokers shares on the open market, and 2 insiders sold $34.5 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $85.42 | $2,136 | Form 4 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $94.53 | $2,363 | Form 4 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $87.03 | $2,176 | Form 4 |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $88.03 | $2,201 | Form 4 |
| Jun 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $86.10 | $2,152 | Form 4 |
| May 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $79.64 | $1,991 | Form 4 |
| Apr 28, 2026 | Lawrence E HarrisDirector | Sold | 26,000 | $76.93 | $2.0 million | Form 4 |
| Apr 1, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $68.38 | $1,710 | Form 4 |
| Mar 2, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 25 | $69.21 | $1,730 | Form 4 |
| Feb 25, 2026 | Lori A ConklingDirector | Bought plan | 50 | $73.21 | $3,660 | Form 4 |
| Jan 27, 2026 | Earl H NemserVice Chairman, Director | Sold | 60,200 | $75.30 | $4.5 million | Form 4 |
| Jan 26, 2026 | Earl H NemserVice Chairman, Director | Sold | 94,800 | $76.19 | $7.2 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | — | — | — |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | — | — | — |
| Accruals ratio | −3.2% | −5.7% | −8.4% |
Compare
Put Interactive Brokers side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interactive Brokers | FY25 | 19.7% | — | 253.7% | — | −0.6x | — | |
| Robinhood | FY25 | 51.6% | — | 36.3% | — | — | — | Compare |
| Evercore | FY25 | 29.5% | — | 30.5% | — | −2.9x | 5 | Compare |
| Virtu Financial | FY25 | 26.2% | — | 13.6% | 37.9% | 0.8x | — | Compare |
| BGC Group | FY25 | 30.0% | — | 12.7% | 13.2% | 1.7x | — | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 1,396 | 1,702 | 1,903 | 1,937 | 2,218 | 2,714 | 3,067 | 4,340 | 5,185 | 6,205 |
| Revenue growth | 17.4% | 21.9% | 11.8% | 1.8% | 14.5% | 22.4% | 13.0% | 41.5% | 19.5% | 19.7% |
| Gross profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net income | 84 | 76 | 169 | 161 | 195 | 308 | 380 | 600 | 755 | 984 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 1.42 | 1.73 | 2.22 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 269 | 284 | 297 | 307 | 323 | 380 | 405 | 423 | 436 | 444 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 635 | 1,065 | 2,356 | 2,666 | 8,068 | 5,896 | 3,968 | 4,544 | 8,724 | 15,811 |
| Capital expenditure | 27 | 28 | 36 | 74 | 50 | 77 | 69 | 49 | 49 | 67 |
| Free cash flow | 608 | 1,037 | 2,320 | 2,592 | 8,018 | 5,819 | 3,899 | 4,495 | 8,675 | 15,744 |
| Dividends paid | 26 | 28 | 29 | 31 | 32 | 38 | 40 | 42 | 92 | 134 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 51 | 53 | 58 | 60 | 65 | 80 | 92 | 100 | 112 | 118 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 1,925 | 1,732 | 2,597 | 2,882 | 4,292 | 2,395 | 3,436 | 3,753 | 3,633 | 4,963 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 74 | 15 | 17 | 16 | 214 | 27 | 18 | 17 | 14 | 19 |
| Total assets | 54,673 | 61,162 | 60,547 | 71,676 | 95,679 | 109,113 | 115,143 | 128,251 | 150,142 | 203,240 |
| Total liabilities | 48,853 | 54,729 | 53,391 | 63,736 | 86,676 | 98,891 | 103,528 | 114,184 | 133,545 | 182,768 |
| Shareholders' equity | 974 | 1,090 | 1,282 | 1,452 | 1,951 | 2,395 | 2,848 | 3,584 | 4,280 | 5,363 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Net margin | 6.0% | 4.5% | 8.9% | 8.3% | 8.8% | 11.3% | 12.4% | 13.8% | 14.6% | 15.9% |
| Free cash flow margin | 43.5% | 60.9% | 121.9% | 133.8% | 361.5% | 214.4% | 127.1% | 103.6% | 167.3% | 253.7% |
| Return on capital | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Return on assets | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.3% | 0.3% | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −2.1x | −1.3x | −1.5x | −1.6x | −2.6x | −1.1x | −1.1x | −0.6x | −0.5x | −0.6x |