Rubrik
Rubrik's revenue rose 48.5% to $1.3 billion in fiscal 2026. Its operating margin was −26.2%, up from −127.9% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $253 million, up 708.1%. The diluted share count rose 27.3%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on equity is net income as a share of shareholders' equity. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
Rubrik lost money in fiscal 2026: a net loss of $349 million.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Rubrik yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Rubrik's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Rubrik's fiscal 2026 free cash flow of $253M, net cash of $545M at January 31, 2026 and 196 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Rubrik: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 29.9% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 10%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Systems Software), plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2026); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $133.40
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
The P/E method needs positive earnings, and Rubrik's latest diluted earnings per share were negative or zero.
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 141 | 279 | 705 | 1,676 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | — | 287 | 322 | 1,131 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | — | 8 | −383 | −545 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — |
| Debt to equity | — | — | — | — |
| Interest coverage | −22.3x | −10.1x | −27.5x | −20.1x |
| Current ratio | — | 0.8x | 1.1x | 1.7x |
| Quick ratio | — | 0.8x | 1.1x | 1.7x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $502,220 of Rubrik shares on the open market, and 6 insiders sold $70.3 million, $50.8 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2026 | Kiran Kumar ChoudaryChief Financial Officer | Sold plan | 6,000 | $107.32 | $643,922 | Form 4 |
| Sep 15, 2026 | Kiran Kumar ChoudaryChief Financial Officer | Sold plan | 4,000 | $101.05 | $404,186 | Form 4 |
| Sep 10, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $90.41 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 9, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $90.46 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 8, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $91.33 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Sep 3, 2026 | Yvonne WassenaarDirector | Sold plan | 721 | $89.52 | $64,544 | Form 4 |
| Sep 1, 2026 | John Wendell ThompsonDirector | Sold plan | 13,500 | $89.03 | $1.2 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Kiran Kumar ChoudaryChief Financial Officer | Sold plan | 10,000 | $98.32 | $983,188 | Form 4 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $83.71 | $1.1 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 4, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $79.81 | $1.0 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | John Wendell ThompsonDirector | Sold plan | 13,500 | $74.10 | $1.0 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 3, 2026 | Arvind NithrakashyapChief Technology Officer, Director | Sold plan | 12,820 | $74.04 | $949,233 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | — | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations is positive | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | — | — | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | — | — | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | — | Pass | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | — | — | Fail |
| F-score | — | — | 5 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | — | −104.8% | −30.2% |
Compare
Put Rubrik side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubrik | FY26 | 48.5% | −26.2% | 19.2% | — | — | 5 | |
| CommVault Systems | FY26 | 18.9% | 6.2% | 20.0% | — | −0.2x | 6 | Compare |
| UiPath | FY26 | 12.7% | 3.5% | 21.9% | 13.7% | −20.0x | 7 | Compare |
| Qualys | FY25 | 10.1% | 33.2% | 45.5% | 169.1% | −1.9x | 6 | Compare |
| Check Point | FY25 | 6.2% | 30.5% | 43.0% | — | −2.8x | 7 | Compare |
4 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | FY26 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||
| Revenue | 600 | 628 | 886 | 1,316 |
| Revenue growth | — | 4.7% | 41.2% | 48.5% |
| Gross profit | 418 | 483 | 621 | 1,054 |
| Research and development | 175 | 206 | 532 | 374 |
| Operating income | −262 | −306 | −1,134 | −345 |
| Net income | −278 | −354 | −1,155 | −349 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −4.66 | −5.84 | −7.48 | −1.78 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 60 | 61 | 154 | 196 |
| Cash flow | ||||
| Cash from operations | 19 | −4 | 48 | 283 |
| Capital expenditure | 25 | 12 | 17 | 30 |
| Free cash flow | −6 | −17 | 31 | 253 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 90 | 0 | 21 |
| Stock-based compensation | 7 | 6 | 914 | 329 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 141 | 279 | 705 | 1,676 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | — | 287 | 322 | 1,131 |
| Total assets | — | 874 | 1,423 | 2,766 |
| Total liabilities | — | 1,578 | 1,977 | 3,286 |
| Shareholders' equity | −1,087 | −1,419 | −554 | −520 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||
| Gross margin | 69.7% | 76.9% | 70.0% | 80.1% |
| Operating margin | −43.6% | −48.8% | −127.9% | −26.2% |
| Net margin | −46.3% | −56.4% | −130.3% | −26.5% |
| Free cash flow margin | −1.0% | −2.7% | 3.5% | 19.2% |
| Return on capital | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | — |
| Return on assets | — | — | −100.6% | −16.6% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — |