Thermo Fisher Scientific
Thermo Fisher Scientific's revenue rose 3.9% to $44.6 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 17.4%, up from 17.1% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $6.3 billion, down 13.4%. It paid out $3.6 billion in dividends and buybacks, 58% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 1.3%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What Thermo Fisher Scientific does
Thermo Fisher Scientific sells instruments, supplies and services to scientists and laboratories. Its customers include drug and biotech companies, hospitals and clinical labs, universities, research institutes, government agencies, and industrial and environmental testing operations. Its brands include Thermo Scientific, Applied Biosystems, Invitrogen, Fisher Scientific, Patheon and PPD.
It has four segments. Life Sciences Solutions sells reagents, instruments and consumables for biological research, drug and vaccine development and the production of biologic drugs. Analytical Instruments sells instruments such as mass spectrometers and electron microscopes, with the supplies, software and services that go with them. Specialty Diagnostics sells diagnostic test kits, reagents, culture media and instruments. Laboratory Products and Biopharma Services sells lab supplies, equipment and chemicals, and offers outsourced services to drug makers, including clinical trials and commercial drug manufacturing.
The company says it grows through investment in research, capacity and acquisitions, and through its global sales channels.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- Slow or falling growth in the research and drug markets it sells into, which can be cyclical.
- Currency swings, tariffs and political risk in its many international markets.
- Failing to complete or successfully absorb acquisitions.
- Reliance on single or limited suppliers for some materials and parts.
- Its debt could limit what it can invest in and affect its credit ratings.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 14.9% a year and net income 14.2% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 5%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Thermo Fisher Scientific yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Thermo Fisher Scientific's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Thermo Fisher Scientific's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $6.3B, net cash of −$29.3B at December 31, 2025 and 378 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Thermo Fisher Scientific: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -0.3% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 9% for a business of moderate risk (Life Sciences Tools & Services); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $684.89
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Thermo Fisher Scientific's earnings per share of $18.59 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 34.7×, the middle of Thermo Fisher Scientific's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 10%, 9% and 8%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $684.89
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Thermo Fisher Scientific's P/E at the last close
- 36.8×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| DanaherDHR | $232.97 | $6.11 | 38.1× |
| Thermo Fisher ScientificTMO | $684.89 | $18.59 | 36.8× |
| Agilent TechnologiesA | $175.96 | $5.07 | 34.7× |
| IQVIAIQV | $273.60 | $8.06 | 33.9× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 4.5 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 5.6 | 10.1 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 34.9 | 34.5 | 34.9 | 31.3 | 39.4 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 30.4 | 26.0 | 26.8 | 25.7 | 29.3 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 2.4x | 2.2x | 2.6x | 2.5x | 2.8x |
| Debt to equity | 0.8x | 0.8x | 0.8x | 0.6x | 0.7x |
| Interest coverage | 18.7x | 11.6x | 5.0x | 5.3x | 5.5x |
| Current ratio | 1.5x | 1.5x | 1.8x | 1.7x | 1.9x |
| Quick ratio | 1.1x | 1.1x | 1.4x | 1.3x | 1.5x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Thermo Fisher Scientific shares on the open market, and 7 insiders sold $148.1 million, $79.7 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2026 | Gianluca PettitiPresident & COO | Sold plan | 4,133 | $614.38 | $2.5 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 275 | $627.05 | $172,439 | Form 4 |
| Aug 21, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 10,000 | $626.92 | $6.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 20, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 10,000 | $629.27 | $6.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 19, 2026 | Lisa P. BrittSr. VP and Chief HR Officer | Sold | 11,440 | $613.12 | $7.0 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | Michael D ShaferExecutive Vice President | Sold plan | 25,500 | $600.00 | $15.3 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 4,883 | $586.12 | $2.9 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Joseph R. HolmesVP & Chief Accounting Officer | Sold | 420 | $584.81 | $245,620 | Form 4 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 15,000 | $574.46 | $8.6 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 6, 2026 | Lisa P. BrittSr. VP and Chief HR Officer | Sold | 5,850 | $580.00 | $3.4 million | Form 4 |
| Aug 5, 2026 | Marc N CasperChairman & CEO, Director | Sold plan | 15,000 | $575.23 | $8.6 million | Form 4 |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Gianluca PettitiPresident & COO | Sold plan | 400 | $565.00 | $226,000 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| F-score | 6 of 8 | 6 of 8 | 7 of 8 |
| Accruals ratio | −2.5% | −2.4% | −1.1% |
Compare
Put Thermo Fisher Scientific side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thermo Fisher Scientific | FY25 | 3.9% | 17.4% | 14.1% | 9.1% | 2.8x | 7 | |
| Danaher | FY25 | 2.9% | 19.1% | 21.4% | 6.1% | 1.9x | 7 | Compare |
| IQVIA | FY25 | 5.9% | 13.4% | 12.6% | 9.4% | 4.2x | 5 | Compare |
| Agilent Technologies | FY25 | 6.7% | 21.3% | 16.6% | 16.5% | 0.9x | 5 | Compare |
| Avantor | FY25 | −3.4% | −3.8% | 7.5% | −2.0% | 22.0x | 5 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 18.3 | 20.9 | 24.4 | 25.5 | 32.2 | 39.2 | 44.9 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 44.6 |
| Revenue growth | 7.7% | 14.5% | 16.4% | 4.9% | 26.1% | 21.7% | 14.6% | −4.6% | 0.1% | 3.9% |
| Gross profit | 10.1 | 11.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Operating income | 2.5 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 7.8 | 10.0 | 8.4 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 7.7 |
| Net income | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.9 | 3.7 | 6.4 | 7.7 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 5.09 | 5.59 | 7.24 | 9.17 | 15.96 | 19.46 | 17.63 | 15.45 | 16.53 | 17.74 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 397 | 398 | 406 | 403 | 399 | 397 | 394 | 388 | 383 | 378 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 3.3 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 8.3 | 9.3 | 9.2 | 8.4 | 8.7 | 7.8 |
| Capital expenditure | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| Free cash flow | 2.8 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 7.3 | 6.3 |
| Dividends paid | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Share buybacks | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| Acquisitions | 5.2 | 7.2 | 0.5 | 1.8 | 0.0 | 19.4 | 0.0 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 4.0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 0.8 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 10.3 | 4.5 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 5.6 | 10.1 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 16.3 | 19.8 | 19.7 | — | 21.7 | 34.9 | 34.5 | 34.9 | 31.3 | 39.4 |
| Total assets | 45.9 | 56.7 | 56.2 | 58.4 | 69.1 | 95.1 | 97.2 | 98.7 | 97.3 | 110.3 |
| Total liabilities | 24.4 | 31.3 | 28.6 | 28.7 | 34.5 | 54.3 | 53.1 | 52.0 | 47.8 | 56.9 |
| Shareholders' equity | 21.5 | 25.4 | 27.6 | 29.7 | 34.5 | 40.8 | 44.0 | 46.7 | 49.6 | 53.4 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 55.0% | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | 13.4% | 14.2% | 15.5% | 18.0% | 24.2% | 25.6% | 18.7% | 16.0% | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Net margin | 11.1% | 10.6% | 12.1% | 14.5% | 19.8% | 19.7% | 15.5% | 14.0% | 14.8% | 15.1% |
| Free cash flow margin | 15.4% | 16.7% | 15.5% | 15.8% | 21.1% | 17.3% | 15.4% | 16.2% | 16.9% | 14.1% |
| Return on capital | 7.1% | 6.7% | 7.7% | — | — | 15.0% | 10.8% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 9.1% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 9.5% | 11.1% | 12.9% | 19.9% | 20.5% | 16.4% | 13.2% | 13.2% | 13.0% |
| Return on assets | 4.7% | 4.3% | 5.2% | 6.5% | 10.0% | 9.4% | 7.2% | 6.1% | 6.5% | 6.5% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 3.7x | 3.7x | 2.9x | — | 1.1x | 2.4x | 2.2x | 2.6x | 2.5x | 2.8x |