Winmark
Winmark's revenue rose 5.9% to $86 million in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 63.4%, down from 65.1% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $45 million, up 6.5%. It paid out $52 million in dividends and buybacks, 115% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 0.5%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on equity is net income as a share of shareholders' equity. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 9.2% a year and net income 7.3% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 14%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Winmark yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Winmark's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Winmark's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $45M, net cash of −$20M at December 27, 2025 and 4 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Winmark: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 1.9% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 10%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Other Specialty Retail), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $1.0B; the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $282.29
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Winmark's earnings per share of $11.21 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 19.9×, the middle of Winmark's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 11%, 10% and 9%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $282.29
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Winmark's P/E at the last close
- 25.2×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChewyCHWY | $21.90 | $0.66 | 33.2× |
| WinmarkWINA | $282.29 | $11.21 | 25.2× |
| Ulta BeautyULTA | $625.33 | $27.42 | 22.8× |
| Tractor SupplyTSCO | $32.53 | $1.92 | 16.9× |
| Bath & Body WorksBBWI | $21.38 | $3.79 | 5.6× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 11 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 10 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 48 | 43 | 39 | — | 30 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 36 | 30 | 26 | — | 20 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.7x | 0.6x | 0.5x | — | 0.4x |
| Debt to equity | — | — | — | — | — |
| Interest coverage | 35.3x | 18.4x | 17.2x | 18.5x | 22.3x |
| Current ratio | 1.8x | 1.7x | 1.6x | 3.0x | 2.5x |
| Quick ratio | 1.7x | 1.6x | 1.6x | 2.9x | 2.4x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Winmark shares on the open market, and 2 insiders sold $3.6 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2026 | Jenele C GrassleDirector | Sold | 3,900 | $475.80 | $1.9 million | Form 4 |
| Mar 3, 2026 | Percy C Tomlinson JrDirector | Sold | 1,660 | $460.52 | $764,463 | Form 4 |
| Nov 21, 2025 | Jenele C GrassleDirector | Sold | 2,400 | $420.87 | $1.0 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | — | — |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Pass | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 4 of 9 | — | — |
| Accruals ratio | −12.8% | −7.9% | −12.5% |
Compare
Put Winmark side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winmark | FY25 | 5.9% | 63.4% | 52.0% | — | 0.4x | — | |
| Bath & Body Works | FY25 | −0.2% | 15.4% | 11.9% | 47.5% | 2.1x | 5 | Compare |
| Ulta Beauty | FY25 | 9.7% | 12.4% | 8.6% | 55.8% | −0.2x | 6 | Compare |
| Chewy | FY25 | 6.2% | 2.0% | 4.5% | — | −2.3x | 7 | Compare |
| Tractor Supply | FY25 | 4.3% | 9.4% | 4.8% | 28.5% | 0.8x | 6 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 66 | 70 | 72 | 73 | 66 | 78 | 81 | 83 | 81 | 86 |
| Revenue growth | −4.2% | 4.9% | 4.0% | 1.1% | −9.9% | 18.4% | 4.1% | 2.2% | −2.4% | 5.9% |
| Gross profit | 64 | 67 | 70 | 71 | 64 | 75 | 78 | 79 | 78 | 83 |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | 38 | 39 | 42 | 43 | 40 | 51 | 54 | 53 | 53 | 55 |
| Net income | 22 | 25 | 30 | 32 | 30 | 40 | 39 | 40 | 40 | 42 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 5.11 | 5.66 | 7.26 | 7.84 | 7.72 | 10.48 | 10.97 | 11.04 | 10.89 | 11.30 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 26 | 25 | 35 | 51 | 43 | 48 | 44 | 44 | 42 | 45 |
| Capital expenditure | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Free cash flow | 26 | 25 | 34 | 50 | 43 | 48 | 44 | 44 | 42 | 45 |
| Dividends paid | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 33 | 19 | 44 | 39 | 49 |
| Share buybacks | 2 | 50 | 2 | 24 | 49 | 44 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25 | 7 | 11 | 14 | 13 | 12 | 10 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 22 | 32 | 29 | 26 | 22 | 48 | 43 | 39 | — | 30 |
| Total assets | 49 | 49 | 47 | 62 | 31 | 27 | 30 | 29 | 27 | 25 |
| Total liabilities | 62 | 85 | 52 | 49 | 43 | 66 | 92 | 88 | 78 | 79 |
| Shareholders' equity | −13 | −36 | −5 | 12 | −11 | −39 | −62 | −59 | −51 | −54 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 96.8% | 96.5% | 96.2% | 96.6% | 96.8% | 96.2% | 95.4% | 94.6% | 95.8% | 96.4% |
| Operating margin | 57.4% | 55.6% | 57.6% | 58.8% | 60.9% | 65.6% | 65.8% | 64.0% | 65.1% | 63.4% |
| Net margin | 33.3% | 35.2% | 41.5% | 43.9% | 45.1% | 51.0% | 48.4% | 48.3% | 49.1% | 48.4% |
| Free cash flow margin | 39.4% | 36.0% | 47.2% | 68.9% | 65.4% | 61.7% | 53.6% | 52.4% | 51.6% | 52.0% |
| Return on capital | — | — | 380.7% | 193.6% | 368.4% | — | — | — | — | — |
| Return on equity | — | — | — | 841.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Return on assets | 46.1% | 50.5% | 63.1% | 59.3% | 64.0% | 137.1% | 137.5% | 135.2% | 143.2% | 161.1% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 0.5x | 0.8x | 0.6x | 0.0x | 0.4x | 0.7x | 0.6x | 0.5x | — | 0.4x |