Xylem
Xylem's revenue rose 5.5% to $9.0 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 13.5%, up from 11.8% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $910 million, down 3.4%. It paid out $406 million in dividends and buybacks, 45% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 0.2%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 11.7% a year and net income 15.6% a year, as new shares raised the share count by 36% and diluted each share's earnings.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Xylem yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Xylem's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Xylem's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $910M, net cash of −$1.1B at December 31, 2025 and 244 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Xylem: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 17.8% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 9% for a business of moderate risk (Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $108.24
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Xylem's earnings per share of $4.20 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 25.8×, the middle of Xylem's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (Xylem's own P/E today) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 10%, 9% and 8%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $108.24
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Xylem's P/E at the last close
- 25.8×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingersoll RandIR | $74.52 | $2.43 | 30.7× |
| HubbellHUBB | $459.40 | $16.93 | 27.1× |
| XylemXYL | $108.24 | $4.20 | 25.8× |
| DoverDOV | $202.51 | $8.58 | 23.6× |
| Otis WorldwideOTIS | $75.27 | $3.89 | 19.3× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 1,349 | 944 | 1,019 | 1,121 | 1,479 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 2,440 | 1,905 | 2,370 | 2,172 | 2,613 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | 1,091 | 961 | 1,351 | 1,051 | 1,134 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.2x | 0.7x | 0.6x |
| Debt to equity | 0.8x | 0.6x | 0.2x | 0.2x | 0.2x |
| Interest coverage | 7.7x | 12.4x | 13.3x | 22.9x | 42.2x |
| Current ratio | 2.3x | 1.9x | 1.8x | 1.8x | 1.6x |
| Quick ratio | 1.8x | 1.4x | 1.3x | 1.3x | 1.3x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, 1 insider bought $141,098 of Xylem shares on the open market, and 3 insiders sold $2.3 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2026 | Geri-Michelle McShaneSVP, CAO | Sold | 4,269 | $117.46 | $501,437 | Form 4 |
| May 4, 2026 | Jerome A PeribereDirector | Bought | 1,210 | $116.61 | $141,098 | Form 4 |
| Nov 4, 2025 | Victoria D HarkerDirector | Sold | 1,700 | $148.14 | $251,838 | Form 4 |
| Oct 30, 2025 | Claudia S ToussaintEVP, Cpso | Sold | 10,421 | $152.64 | $1.6 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Fail | Pass |
| F-score | 6 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 6 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −1.9% | −2.3% | −1.7% |
Compare
Put Xylem side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xylem | FY25 | 5.5% | 13.5% | 10.1% | 8.1% | 0.6x | 6 | |
| Dover | FY25 | 4.5% | 17.0% | 13.8% | 12.0% | 1.4x | 5 | Compare |
| Ingersoll Rand | FY25 | 5.8% | 15.0% | 15.9% | 6.5% | 2.1x | 5 | Compare |
| Hubbell | FY25 | 3.8% | 20.7% | 15.0% | 18.7% | 1.3x | 7 | Compare |
| Otis Worldwide | FY25 | 1.2% | 14.8% | 10.0% | 116.6% | 3.0x | 5 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 3,771 | 4,707 | 5,207 | 5,249 | 4,876 | 5,195 | 5,522 | 7,364 | 8,562 | 9,035 |
| Revenue growth | 3.2% | 24.8% | 10.6% | 0.8% | −7.1% | 6.5% | 6.3% | 33.4% | 16.3% | 5.5% |
| Gross profit | 1,462 | 1,847 | 2,026 | 2,046 | 1,830 | 1,975 | 2,084 | 2,717 | 3,212 | 3,475 |
| Research and development | 110 | 181 | 189 | 191 | 187 | 204 | 206 | 232 | 230 | 226 |
| Operating income | 408 | 552 | 654 | 486 | 367 | 585 | 622 | 652 | 1,009 | 1,223 |
| Net income | 260 | 331 | 549 | 401 | 254 | 427 | 355 | 609 | 890 | 957 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 1.45 | 1.83 | 3.03 | 2.21 | 1.40 | 2.35 | 1.96 | 2.79 | 3.65 | 3.92 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 180 | 181 | 181 | 181 | 181 | 182 | 181 | 218 | 244 | 244 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 497 | 686 | 586 | 839 | 824 | 538 | 596 | 837 | 1,263 | 1,241 |
| Capital expenditure | 124 | 170 | 237 | 226 | 183 | 208 | 208 | 271 | 321 | 331 |
| Free cash flow | 373 | 516 | 349 | 613 | 641 | 330 | 388 | 566 | 942 | 910 |
| Dividends paid | 112 | 130 | 152 | 174 | 188 | 203 | 217 | 299 | 350 | 391 |
| Share buybacks | 4 | 25 | 59 | 40 | 61 | 68 | 52 | 25 | 20 | 15 |
| Acquisitions | 1,782 | 33 | 433 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 476 | 193 | 163 |
| Stock-based compensation | 18 | 21 | 30 | 29 | 26 | 33 | 37 | 60 | 56 | 53 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 308 | 414 | 296 | 724 | 1,875 | 1,349 | 944 | 1,019 | 1,121 | 1,479 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 2,368 | 2,200 | 2,308 | 2,316 | 3,084 | 2,440 | 1,905 | 2,370 | 2,172 | 2,613 |
| Total assets | 6,474 | 6,860 | 7,222 | 7,710 | 8,750 | 8,276 | 7,952 | 16,112 | 16,493 | 17,634 |
| Total liabilities | 4,267 | 4,341 | 4,440 | 4,743 | 5,774 | 5,050 | 4,449 | 5,936 | 5,611 | 5,885 |
| Shareholders' equity | 2,190 | 2,503 | 2,768 | 2,957 | 2,968 | 3,218 | 3,494 | 10,166 | 10,642 | 11,480 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 38.8% | 39.2% | 38.9% | 39.0% | 37.5% | 38.0% | 37.7% | 36.9% | 37.5% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 10.8% | 11.7% | 12.6% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 11.3% | 11.3% | 8.8% | 11.8% | 13.5% |
| Net margin | 6.9% | 7.0% | 10.5% | 7.6% | 5.2% | 8.2% | 6.4% | 8.3% | 10.4% | 10.6% |
| Free cash flow margin | 9.9% | 11.0% | 6.7% | 11.7% | 13.2% | 6.3% | 7.0% | 7.7% | 11.0% | 10.1% |
| Return on capital | 9.0% | 9.1% | 13.5% | 10.0% | 7.5% | 11.5% | 11.4% | 7.8% | 7.1% | 8.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.2% | 14.1% | 20.8% | 14.0% | 8.6% | 13.8% | 10.6% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 8.7% |
| Return on assets | 4.7% | 5.0% | 7.8% | 5.4% | 3.1% | 5.0% | 4.4% | 5.1% | 5.5% | 5.6% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 3.7x | 2.3x | 2.2x | 2.1x | 2.0x | 1.3x | 1.1x | 1.2x | 0.7x | 0.6x |