Zillow
Zillow's revenue rose 15.5% to $2.6 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was −1.3%, up from −8.8% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $235 million, down 17.5%. It paid out $670 million in dividends and buybacks, 285% of free cash flow. The diluted share count rose 8.6%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
What Zillow does
Zillow runs real estate websites and apps in the United States where people look for homes to buy or rent. Its database covers about 173 million U.S. homes, and it shows a home value estimate for each called the Zestimate. Beyond listings, it offers tools for buyers, sellers, renters, landlords and real estate agents, and a mortgage business, Zillow Home Loans.
Zillow earns money from real estate professionals, property managers and lenders. Agents and teams buy advertising and software, such as Zillow Preferred and Follow Up Boss, and the company passes them connections to people who are ready to move. Zillow Preferred is an invite-only program in which agents pay when a deal closes. Multifamily property managers pay to advertise rental vacancies. Zillow Home Loans makes mortgages and generally sells them on the secondary market.
In rentals, Zillow had 2.4 million average monthly active rental listings in 2025, and it lets renters tour, apply, sign a lease and pay rent. It shares listings with Redfin and Realtor.com. Zillow says it competes with other companies for customers and for real estate partners. It also says the health of the U.S. housing market affects its results, and that low housing inventory and high, shifting mortgage rates have made buying and selling harder.
Its biggest risks, as it describes them
- The health of the U.S. residential real estate market, and downturns or big changes in it.
- Real estate partners cutting back or ending their spending with Zillow, or Zillow failing to keep their business.
- Losing access to listings data from brokerages, listing services and other data providers.
- Disputes and rules about the accuracy and display of its Zestimate home values.
- Zillow Home Loans' need for financing, its reliance on government-sponsored entities, and sensitivity to interest rates.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Zillow yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Zillow's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Zillow's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $235M, net cash of $1.3B at December 31, 2025 and 254 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Zillow: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, 9.7% a year; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Real Estate Services), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $7.7B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (a loss in fiscal 2024); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $33.73
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Zillow's earnings per share of $0.22 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 88.2×, the middle of Zillow's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $33.73
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Zillow's P/E at the last close
- 153.3×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| CoStar GroupCSGP | $33.70 | $0.18 | 187.2× |
| CompassCOMP | $9.69 | $0.06 | 161.5× |
| ZillowZG | $33.73 | $0.22 | 153.3× |
| Howard HughesHHH | $73.30 | $4.90 | 15.0× |
| Newmark GroupNMRK | $11.34 | $0.80 | 14.2× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 2,830 | 3,364 | 2,813 | 1,858 | 1,295 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 1,319 | 1,660 | 1,607 | 418 | 0 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −1,511 | −1,704 | −1,206 | −1,440 | −1,295 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −4.1x | −26.6x | — | −33.5x | −5.6x |
| Debt to equity | 0.2x | 0.4x | 0.4x | 0.1x | 0.0x |
| Interest coverage | 1.9x | −2.7x | −7.5x | −5.5x | −1.9x |
| Current ratio | 2.0x | 13.3x | 3.2x | 2.8x | 3.1x |
| Quick ratio | 2.0x | 13.3x | 3.2x | 2.8x | 3.1x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Zillow shares on the open market, and 12 insiders sold $14.6 million, $9.1 million of it under trading plans set up in advance.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2026 | Thielke Claire CormierDirector | Sold plan | 1,187 | $35.71 | $42,388 | Form 4 |
| Sep 3, 2026 | Erik C BlachfordDirector | Sold plan | 792 | $35.71 | $28,282 | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Jeremy WacksmanChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 9,339 | $34.18 | $319,207 | Form 4 |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Jeremy HofmannCOO & CFO | Sold plan | 5,661 | $34.18 | $193,493 | Form 4 |
| Aug 14, 2026 | Dan SpauldingChief People Officer | Sold | 3,169 | $35.37 | $112,088 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Jeremy WacksmanChief Executive Officer, Director | Sold plan | 5,786 | $34.24 | $198,113 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Jeremy HofmannCOO & CFO | Sold plan | 3,510 | $34.24 | $120,182 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Errol G SamuelsonChief Industry Dev. Officer | Sold | 3,154 | $34.24 | $107,993 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Dan SpauldingChief People Officer | Sold | 1,966 | $34.24 | $67,316 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | David A. BeitelChief Technology Officer | Sold | 1,798 | $34.24 | $61,564 | Form 4 |
| Aug 13, 2026 | Jennifer RockChief Accounting Officer | Sold | 990 | $34.24 | $33,898 | Form 4 |
| Aug 11, 2026 | Thielke Claire CormierDirector | Sold plan | 1,187 | $33.09 | $39,278 | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Pass | Pass |
| Current ratio rose | Fail | Fail | Pass |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Gross margin rose | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| F-score | 4 of 9 | 5 of 9 | 7 of 9 |
| Accruals ratio | −7.8% | −8.7% | −6.0% |
Compare
Put Zillow side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zillow | FY25 | 15.5% | −1.3% | 9.1% | −0.9% | −5.6x | 7 | |
| CoStar Group | FY25 | 18.7% | −2.2% | 3.8% | −0.6% | −3.3x | 5 | Compare |
| Newmark Group | FY25 | 20.3% | 7.1% | 4.3% | 8.6% | 1.1x | 7 | Compare |
| Howard Hughes | FY25 | −15.8% | 22.5% | 28.3% | 3.4% | 7.1x | — | Compare |
| Compass | FY25 | 23.7% | −0.9% | 2.9% | — | — | — | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 847 | 1,077 | 1,334 | 2,743 | 1,624 | 2,132 | 1,958 | 1,945 | 2,236 | 2,583 |
| Revenue growth | 31.3% | 27.2% | 23.8% | 105.7% | −40.8% | 31.3% | −8.2% | −0.7% | 15.0% | 15.5% |
| Gross profit | 777 | 992 | 1,180 | 1,199 | 1,369 | 1,809 | 1,591 | 1,524 | 1,709 | 1,915 |
| Research and development | 256 | 320 | 411 | 351 | 324 | 421 | 498 | 560 | 585 | 607 |
| Operating income | −193 | −162 | −129 | −248 | 109 | 239 | −93 | −270 | −197 | −34 |
| Net income | −220 | −94 | −120 | −305 | −162 | −528 | −101 | −158 | −112 | 23 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | −1.22 | −0.51 | −0.61 | −1.48 | −0.70 | −2.02 | −0.42 | −0.68 | −0.48 | 0.09 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 180 | 186 | 198 | 206 | 231 | 262 | 242 | 234 | 234 | 254 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 9 | 258 | 4 | −612 | 423 | −3,177 | 4,504 | 354 | 428 | 368 |
| Capital expenditure | 62 | 67 | 66 | 67 | 85 | 74 | 115 | 135 | 143 | 133 |
| Free cash flow | −53 | 191 | −62 | −679 | 338 | −3,251 | 4,389 | 219 | 285 | 235 |
| Dividends paid | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Share buybacks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 302 | 947 | 424 | 301 | 670 |
| Acquisitions | 16 | 12 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 497 | 4 | 433 | 7 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 107 | 114 | 149 | 199 | 197 | 312 | 451 | 451 | 448 | 390 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 508 | 762 | 1,567 | 2,512 | 3,997 | 2,830 | 3,364 | 2,813 | 1,858 | 1,295 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 367 | 385 | 699 | 1,553 | 1,614 | 1,319 | 1,660 | 1,607 | 418 | 0 |
| Total assets | 3,150 | 3,230 | 4,291 | 6,132 | 7,487 | 10,695 | 6,563 | 6,652 | 5,829 | 5,685 |
| Total liabilities | 616 | 570 | 1,024 | 2,697 | 2,745 | 5,354 | 2,081 | 2,126 | 981 | 801 |
| Shareholders' equity | 2,534 | 2,661 | 3,267 | 3,435 | 4,742 | 5,341 | 4,482 | 4,526 | 4,848 | 4,884 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | 91.8% | 92.1% | 88.5% | 43.7% | 84.3% | 84.8% | 81.3% | 78.3% | 76.4% | 74.1% |
| Operating margin | −22.8% | −15.0% | −9.7% | −9.0% | 6.7% | 11.2% | −4.8% | −13.9% | −8.8% | −1.3% |
| Net margin | −26.0% | −8.8% | −9.0% | −11.1% | −10.0% | −24.8% | −5.2% | −8.1% | −5.0% | 0.9% |
| Free cash flow margin | −6.3% | 17.8% | −4.7% | −24.8% | 20.8% | −152.5% | 224.2% | 11.3% | 12.8% | 9.1% |
| Return on capital | −6.4% | −5.5% | −4.3% | −8.0% | 3.6% | 7.7% | −2.2% | −7.0% | −4.6% | −0.9% |
| Return on equity | −8.5% | −3.6% | −4.0% | −9.1% | −4.0% | −10.5% | −2.1% | −3.5% | −2.4% | 0.5% |
| Return on assets | −7.0% | −3.0% | −3.2% | −5.9% | −2.4% | −5.8% | −1.2% | −2.4% | −1.8% | 0.4% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | — | — | — | — | −10.8x | −4.1x | −26.6x | — | −33.5x | −5.6x |