Haleon vs Procter & Gamble
Haleon reported revenue of £11.0 billion in fiscal 2025, and Procter & Gamble $87.0 billion in fiscal 2026, in different currencies. Haleon's revenue fell 1.8% in its latest year, and Procter & Gamble's grew 3.3%. Haleon had an operating margin of 21.9%, against 22.7% at Procter & Gamble. Free cash flow was £2.3 billion at Haleon and $15.1 billion at Procter & Gamble. Their fiscal years end in different months (December 31 and June 30), so the periods don't line up exactly.
Side by side
| Haleon | Procter & Gamble | |
|---|---|---|
| Latest fiscal year | FY2025, Dec 31, 2025 | FY2026, Jun 30, 2026 |
| Revenue | £11.0B | $87.0B |
| Revenue growth | −1.8% | 3.3% |
| Revenue growth a year, last 5 years | 2.2% | 2.7% |
| Gross margin | 64.2% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | 21.9% | 22.7% |
| Net margin | 15.1% | 18.4% |
| Free cash flow | £2.3B | $15.1B |
| Free cash flow margin | 21.0% | 17.4% |
| Return on capital | 7.9% | 20.1% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | 2.6x | 1.1x |
| Dividends and buybacks | £763M | $15.3B |
| Change in diluted share count | −1.6% | −1.3% |
| Last close | $10.20 | $159.92 |
| P/E at the last close | — | 24.1× |
| Insider trades, last 12 months | — | sold $70.1 million |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 of 9 | 6 of 9 |
Amounts in each company's own currency, US$ unless marked (a foreign company may report in another), each company's latest fiscal year from its 10-K, or 20-F or 40-F for a foreign company. Growth rates compare with the year before; the five-year rate is the average a year. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending; return on capital is after-tax operating income over the money invested in the business; P/E is the last close over the latest earnings per share. Banks are measured differently (return on equity, efficiency ratio), so some rows apply to one company only.
Ten years
Revenue
In each company's own currency, fiscal years
HaleonProcter & Gamble
Operating margin
Percent of revenue
HaleonProcter & Gamble
Free cash flow
In each company's own currency. Cash from operations minus capital expenditure.
HaleonProcter & Gamble
Source: the companies' Form 10-K filings, from SEC EDGAR, and the last close. For information only, not investment advice: the figures describe results, not which company is the better investment. The Filing Desk is not affiliated with either company. Full figures on the Haleon and Procter & Gamble pages.