Landstar System
Landstar System's revenue fell 1.6% to $4.7 billion in fiscal 2025. Its operating margin was 3.2%, down from 5.2% a year earlier. Free cash flow was $215 million, down 15.9%. It paid out $305 million in dividends and buybacks, 142% of free cash flow. The diluted share count fell 2.3%.
Operating margin is operating income as a share of revenue. Free cash flow is cash from operations minus capital spending. Return on capital is after-tax operating income as a share of the money invested in the business: debt plus equity, minus cash. Market cap is the last closing share price times the latest diluted share count, so it is approximate. P/E is the last close divided by diluted earnings per share over the last four quarters, or the latest fiscal year where the quarters aren't available; there is none when the company made a loss.
Charts show fiscal years, from the 10-K filings.
Revenue and margins
Net income and earnings per share
From fiscal 2016 to 2025, earnings per share grew 0.2% a year and net income fell 2.0% a year, as buybacks cut the share count by 18%.
Returns on capital
Cash flow
Payouts and share count
Valuation
Two ways to value Landstar System yourself, both starting from its filings: a discounted cash flow model and the price-to-earnings method.
Discounted cash flow (DCF)
A discounted cash flow (DCF) model values a business as the cash it may generate in future, discounted back to today. The starting figures come from Landstar System's 10-K (or, for net cash and shares, its latest 10-Q) and the assumptions are yours: start from one of three example scenarios, then change any figure to see what it implies for a share, and how that compares with the last share price.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Landstar System's fiscal 2025 free cash flow of $215M, net cash of $375M at December 27, 2025 and 35 million diluted shares, from its filings. The scenarios are fitted to Landstar System: the base scenario's growth in years 1 to 5 is its revenue growth over the last 3 years, -13.9% a year, kept between 0% and 20%; the cautious and optimistic ones are lower and higher, and growth in years 6 to 10 is halfway to the long-run rate. The base scenario's discount rate is 11%: 9% for a business of moderate risk (Cargo Ground Transportation), plus 1 point as a smaller company, worth $5.6B, plus 1 point for unsteady results (revenue fell in two of the last five years); the cautious and optimistic ones use a point more and a point less. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $165.17
- Value on these assumptions, against the last close
- —
- Cash flows in years 1 to 10, valued today
- —
- Everything after year 10, valued today
- —
- Plus net cash
- —
- Share of value from after year 10
How the value changes with two assumptions
Price-to-earnings (P/E) method
Another common way to value a company is to multiply its earnings per share by a price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple: the number of years of today's earnings an investor pays for a share. A higher multiple usually means investors expect earnings to grow. Choose a multiple, for example from similar companies, to see the value it gives.
Value per share on three example scenarios, from Landstar System's earnings per share of $3.62 (over the last four quarters). Each grows earnings for a year at the cash flow scenarios' rates and applies a multiple to next year's earnings: 33.3×, the middle of Landstar System's own P/E today, its peers' median and its sector's median (its peers' median) for the base scenario, 20% less and more for the cautious and optimistic ones. The price is brought back a year at 12%, 11% and 10%. Select one to load it into the calculator. These are the model's arithmetic on those assumptions, not a forecast or a price target.
- Last close, October 26, 2026
- $165.17
- Value at this multiple, against the last close
- —
- Landstar System's P/E at the last close
- 45.6×
| Company | Last close | Earnings per share | P/E today |
|---|---|---|---|
| Landstar SystemLSTR | $165.17 | $3.62 | 45.6× |
| Old DominionODFL | $182.47 | $5.20 | 35.1× |
| SaiaSAIA | $326.87 | $10.36 | 31.6× |
Balance sheet
| Fiscal year end | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash and short-term investments | 251 | 394 | 541 | 567 | 452 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 112 | 103 | 71 | 102 | 77 |
| Net debt (negative means net cash) | −140 | −290 | −470 | −464 | −375 |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −0.2x | −0.5x | −1.2x | −1.5x | −1.9x |
| Debt to equity | 0.1x | 0.1x | 0.1x | 0.1x | 0.1x |
| Interest coverage | 127.2x | 126.3x | 89.0x | 61.1x | 27.1x |
| Current ratio | 1.5x | 1.6x | 2.0x | 2.0x | 1.8x |
| Quick ratio | 1.5x | 1.6x | 2.0x | 2.0x | 1.8x |
Insider trades
Over the 12 months between October 27, 2025 and October 26, 2026, no insider bought Landstar System shares on the open market, and 2 insiders sold $2.8 million.
| Date | Insider | Trade | Shares | Price | Value | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2026 | James P ToddVP and CFO | Sold | 1,200 | $218.17 | $261,804 | Form 4 |
| Jun 5, 2026 | Diana M MurphyDirector | Sold | 11,246 | $221.28 | $2.5 million | Form 4 |
Piotroski F-score
The F-score counts how many of nine simple tests of profitability, funding and efficiency a company passed in a year (Piotroski, 2000). The more tests passed, the stronger the year: 8 or 9 is strong, 0 to 2 weak. Companies that report no gross profit are scored on the other eight.
| Test | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net income is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Cash from operations is positive | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Return on assets rose | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Cash from operations exceeds net income | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Debt fell relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| Current ratio rose | Pass | Fail | Fail |
| Share count didn't rise | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| Gross margin rose | — | — | — |
| Revenue rose relative to assets | Fail | Fail | Fail |
| F-score | 5 of 8 | 4 of 8 | 4 of 8 |
| Accruals ratio | −6.9% | −5.0% | −6.4% |
Compare
Put Landstar System side by side with any other company we cover: revenue, growth, margins, cash flow and returns, with ten years of charts.
Similar companies
| Company | Year | Revenue growth | Operating margin | Free cash flow margin | Return on capital | Net debt to EBITDA | F-score | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Landstar System | FY25 | −1.6% | 3.2% | 4.5% | 24.9% | −1.9x | 4 | |
| Old Dominion | FY25 | −5.5% | 24.8% | 17.4% | 24.3% | −0.1x | 6 | Compare |
| Saia | FY25 | 0.8% | 10.9% | 0.8% | 10.2% | 0.2x | 6 | Compare |
| Knight-Swift | FY25 | 0.8% | 2.9% | 16.9% | 1.6% | 2.1x | 6 | Compare |
| TFI International | FY25 | −6.1% | 7.2% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 2.0x | 6 | Compare |
10 years of figures
| Fiscal year | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | FY21 | FY22 | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Income statement | ||||||||||
| Revenue | 3,168 | 3,646 | 4,615 | 4,085 | 4,133 | 6,538 | 7,437 | 5,303 | 4,819 | 4,744 |
| Revenue growth | −4.6% | 15.1% | 26.6% | −11.5% | 1.2% | 58.2% | 13.8% | −28.7% | −9.1% | −1.6% |
| Gross profit | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Research and development | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating income | 223 | 244 | 332 | 299 | 253 | 506 | 571 | 344 | 249 | 152 |
| Net income | 137 | 177 | 255 | 228 | 192 | 382 | 431 | 264 | 196 | 115 |
| Diluted EPS (US$) | 3.25 | 4.21 | 6.18 | 5.72 | 4.98 | 9.98 | 11.76 | 7.36 | 5.51 | 3.31 |
| Diluted shares (millions) | 42 | 42 | 41 | 40 | 39 | 38 | 37 | 36 | 36 | 35 |
| Cash flow | ||||||||||
| Cash from operations | 190 | 139 | 298 | 308 | 211 | 277 | 623 | 394 | 287 | 225 |
| Capital expenditure | 23 | 16 | 10 | 19 | 31 | 23 | 26 | 26 | 31 | 10 |
| Free cash flow | 168 | 123 | 288 | 288 | 180 | 253 | 597 | 368 | 256 | 215 |
| Dividends paid | 14 | 16 | 89 | 28 | 110 | 112 | 116 | 117 | 120 | 125 |
| Share buybacks | 50 | 0 | 208 | 89 | 116 | 123 | 286 | 54 | 81 | 180 |
| Acquisitions | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stock-based compensation | 3 | 8 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 28 | 12 | 4 | 3 | 6 |
| Balance sheet at fiscal year end | ||||||||||
| Cash and short-term investments | 246 | 291 | 240 | 352 | 291 | 251 | 394 | 541 | 567 | 452 |
| Debt incl. finance leases | 0 | 0 | 128 | 113 | 101 | 112 | 103 | 71 | 102 | 77 |
| Total assets | 1,097 | 1,352 | 1,381 | 1,428 | 1,654 | 2,046 | 1,932 | 1,802 | 1,813 | 1,636 |
| Total liabilities | 554 | 699 | 691 | 706 | 962 | 1,184 | 1,045 | 818 | 841 | 840 |
| Shareholders' equity | 543 | 651 | 687 | 722 | 692 | 862 | 887 | 984 | 972 | 796 |
| Margins and ratios | ||||||||||
| Gross margin | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Operating margin | 7.0% | 6.7% | 7.2% | 7.3% | 6.1% | 7.7% | 7.7% | 6.5% | 5.2% | 3.2% |
| Net margin | 4.3% | 4.9% | 5.5% | 5.6% | 4.7% | 5.8% | 5.8% | 5.0% | 4.1% | 2.4% |
| Free cash flow margin | 5.3% | 3.4% | 6.2% | 7.1% | 4.4% | 3.9% | 8.0% | 6.9% | 5.3% | 4.5% |
| Return on capital | 46.6% | 54.4% | 54.8% | 43.4% | 39.7% | 62.8% | 65.7% | 47.0% | 37.5% | 24.9% |
| Return on equity | 27.2% | 29.7% | 38.2% | 32.3% | 27.2% | 49.1% | 49.3% | 28.3% | 20.0% | 13.0% |
| Return on assets | 13.2% | 14.5% | 18.7% | 16.2% | 12.5% | 20.6% | 21.7% | 14.2% | 10.8% | 6.7% |
| Net debt to EBITDA | −0.9x | −1.0x | −0.3x | −0.7x | −0.6x | −0.2x | −0.5x | −1.2x | −1.5x | −1.9x |